Riemann tensor: indipendent components

AdeBlackRune
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi, thanks for the attention and excuse for my bad english.
I'm studying general relativity and I have a doubt about the number of indipendent component of the riemann curvature tensor.
We have two kind of riemann tensor:

type (3,1) Rikml

type (4,0) Rrkml

There are also some symmetry rule:

first skew-symmetry
Rrkml = -Rkrml
secondo skew-symmetry
Rrkml = -Rrklm
(Rikml = -Riklm)​
block symmetry
Rrkml = Rmlrk
Bianchi's first identity
Rrkml+Rrlkm+Rrmlk=0​
(Rikml+Rilkm+Rimlk=0)​

Now, the (4,0) R-type has
n2(n2-1)/12
indipendent components. What about the (3,1) R-type? The indipendent component are also n2(n2-1)/12 or they are n2(n2-1)/3?

(In the case n=4, (4,1) R-type has 20 indipendent component; (3,1) R-type are 20 or 80?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would acting with the metric on the Riemann tensor change the number of independent components?
 
haushofer said:
Why would acting with the metric on the Riemann tensor change the number of independent components?

I give up. Why would it not, though it does seems reasonable that raising or lowering indices would have no effect?


Come to think of it, we could take our N independent variables, and transform to Riemann normal coordinates, where the metric is Minkowskian, without loss of generality. With the metric now having constant entries, indices are raised and lowered without changing the number of independent variables.
 
Last edited:
I suppose that raising or lowering indices leaves unchanged the number of indipendent components, but i was not able to find a confirm of that. I thought that, given the metric tensor, the Rikml are (linear?) functions of the Rrkml component. So, can 20 indipendent quantities generate more than 20 indipendent quantities?
 
Of course rising and lowering indicies does not change the number of independent
components of any tensor. However the number of independent components
should depend of the choice of base. For example in coordinate (holonomic)
base the number of independent components of metric tensor is 10 but
in ortonormal base it's of course 0. The number of independent components
of Riemann tensor in 4 dimension in coordinate base is 20 but what about
ortonormal base. Does the extra condidtion imposed on base give in this example any
extra condition which have to be fullfiled by Riemann tensor?
 
We cast around this word 'indendent' so casually at times, it's sometimes hard to tell at times what is independent of what. In the case of a vector, we like to cast it as an object that is independent of coordinate system or metric. The same applies to any tensor object.

In the case of the components of a tensor, I believe we are looking for the linear independence of tensor element, and perhaps eliminate additional degrees of freedom for other reasons.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top