Rigidly rotating relativistic string

da_willem
Messages
594
Reaction score
1
I am reading Zwiebach's 'a first course in string theory' and I have a question. As an example of a solution to the equations of motion he uses a rigidly rotating string with length l in the x-y plane with it's center at the origin. I would like to do some calculations using as parameters

\tau=t and \sigma =s

with s the distance from the origin, and t just time. s runs from -l/2 to l/2. This should be possible right, as I'm free to choose which way to paramterize the string.

Now the solution is (given that the string lies along the x-axis at t=0) ofcourse:

\vec{X} (t,s) = s(cos(\omega t), sin(\omega t))

As the endpoints are not tied down to anything I have to use free enpoint conditions which means the endpoints move at the speed of light. This yields for the enpoints c= \omega l/2. Futhermore you can calculate that l is related to the energy of the string E by:

\frac{2}{\pi} \frac{E}{T_0}

With T0 the tension of the string. Now the solution is complete as both l and omega are found.

Now I would like to calculate the angular momentum, so I can find \alpha &#039;[/tex] the constant of proprtianality between the angular momentum and the energy squared (in terms of hbar). I tried:<br /> <br /> J= \int _{-l/2} ^{l/2} X_1 P_2 - X_2 P_1 ds should be \frac{E^2}{2 \pi T_0 x}<br /> <br /> but now I don&#039;t know what expression to use for P the momentum density. I tried:<br /> <br /> \vec{P} =\frac{T_0}{c^2} \frac{\partial \vec{X}}{\partial t}<br /> <br /> but this yields a result a factor 4/3pi off. So I guess there is something wrong with my expression for P. T_0/c^2 is the rest mass density of a relativistic string. But my string is moving, so I tried<br /> <br /> \vec{P}=\gamma (v) \frac{T_0}{c^2} \frac{\partial \vec{X}}{\partial t}<br /> <br /> with v= \omega s, but this diverges bacause gamma explodes at the string endpoints. What&#039;s wrong? How to calculate the angular momentum using \sigma =s?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
would be nice to have an answer to this question...I would be very interested to see how alpha prime is derived.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top