Discrete What Is the Most Rigorous Combinatorics Book Available?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the search for a rigorous combinatorics book that provides formal definitions and proofs grounded in set theory, particularly regarding counting principles and permutations. The original poster expresses frustration with existing texts that lack thorough explanations and rely on informal reasoning, such as the pigeonhole principle. In response, a recommendation is made for two set theory books: Kunnen's Set Theory and Jech's Set Theory, suggesting that these may better meet the need for rigorous mathematical foundations in combinatorics.
SrVishi
Messages
75
Reaction score
15
Hi, I am trying to find a completely rigorous book on combinatorics. For example, one that states the sum and product counting principles in terms of set theory and proves them, treats permutations as a bijection from a set onto itself, etc. Many don't even explain the reasoning behind those principles, taking them as mere informal facts, so rigorous set theoretic definitions and proofs could at least help my intuition. It seems that even those that try to be rigorous don't live up to it. For example, some don't prove the pigeonhole principle, or do it with informal reasoning in terms of bins/balls. Other times, the attempts at "proofs" are just plain "handwavy." Could someone recommend me a good book? Thanks in advance for any response.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A combinatorics book isn't what you want, you want a set theory book.
 
SrVishi said:
Hi, I am trying to find a completely rigorous book on combinatorics. For example, one that states the sum and product counting principles in terms of set theory and proves them, treats permutations as a bijection from a set onto itself, etc. Many don't even explain the reasoning behind those principles, taking them as mere informal facts, so rigorous set theoretic definitions and proofs could at least help my intuition. It seems that even those that try to be rigorous don't live up to it. For example, some don't prove the pigeonhole principle, or do it with informal reasoning in terms of bins/balls. Other times, the attempts at "proofs" are just plain "handwavy." Could someone recommend me a good book? Thanks in advance for any response.

Try either Kunnen's Set Theory or Jech's Set Theory.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top