RIP Walter Freeman: A Pioneer of Modern Brain Science

  • Thread starter Thread starter DiracPool
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rip
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Walter Freeman, a pioneer of modern brain science, passed away at the age of 89, shortly before the Tucson consciousness conference where a celebration of his career was planned. He published over 450 articles and six books, with his most recent work released in 2016. Freeman's contributions to neuroscience included applying concepts from quantum field theory to neural networks, which sparked both admiration and skepticism among peers. His legacy continues to influence the field, as noted by colleagues and admirers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of neuroscience principles
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of neural networks
  • Awareness of contemporary brain science literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Walter Freeman's publications and their impact on neuroscience
  • Explore the application of quantum field theory in neural network studies
  • Investigate the history and significance of the Tucson consciousness conference
  • Examine critiques and discussions surrounding Freeman's theories
USEFUL FOR

Neuroscientists, students of brain science, and anyone interested in the intersection of quantum theory and neuroscience will benefit from this discussion.

DiracPool
Messages
1,254
Reaction score
514
My inspiration for becoming a brain scientist has passed on so I thought I should provide a brief eulogy for him here at PF. It actually happened a few weeks ago but I didn't want to compete with Marcus's passing, which was equally sad.

Walter was supposed to have a "Festschrift" or celebration of his long and productive career as a pioneer of modern brain science at this year's Tucson consciousness conference, but fell seriously ill several weeks before the event.

http://www.consciousness.arizona.edu/2016WorkshopFreemanFestschrift.htm

A colleague of mine who was close to Walter let me know that he wouldn't be attending the conference and he was there with Walter in the final hours. I fortunately had the privilege to meet and spend some time with Walter and his wife and I will cherish those memories. As Graham Nash of Crosby, Stills, and Nash fame once said, "It's important to touch your heros." You can read about them or watch them on TV and feel you're a part of their magic, but there's no substitute to actually meeting them and touching them. I'm glad I had the opportunity to do that.

Walter was 89 when he died, and we all thought he might live forever. He published over 450 articles and 6 books, and continued to publish essentially until the day he died; his most recent book was published just earlier this year (2016):

https://www.amazon.com/dp/3319244043/?tag=pfamazon01-20

I think he might have lived forever but his dear wife had passed on the previous year. So who knows. I trust he's with her now. Rip Walter. Thank you for everything.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Jackson_Freeman_III
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ProfuselyQuarky, atyy, jim mcnamara and 2 others
Biology news on Phys.org
Thanks DiracPool for sharing you thoughts. Here is the obituary on Berkeley's site:
http://news.berkeley.edu/2016/04/27/neurophysiologist-and-philosopher-walter-freeman-dies-at-89/

[To be honest, I have never read Freeman's work carefully, and am personally skeptical of the little I have heard about his work. However, a number of people I hold in high regard admire Freeman's work, so perhaps I should keep an open mind. I should say that some of the seemingly more surprising things mentioned in the Berkeley obituary like applying "quantum field theory to understanding neural networks" are in some sense mainstream, though I am not sure whether Freeman and I mean the same thing even if we use the same words.]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DiracPool

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
652
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
273
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K