RL parallel circuit & vector problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving an RL parallel circuit with an inductor and resistor, focusing on the calculation of inductance and the proper use of vector and magnitude notation in electrical engineering. Participants explore the implications of measurements from ammeters and wattmeters, as well as the representation of complex numbers in the context of impedance.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a problem involving a parallel RL circuit and attempts to calculate the inductance based on given measurements, expressing uncertainty about their approach.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of using vector math in all calculations, arguing that neglecting angles or components can lead to inaccuracies.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of readings from ammeters, with participants noting that they measure only the magnitude of current without phase information.
  • Participants explore the representation of currents in the circuit as vectors, questioning the need for magnitude notation in certain contexts.
  • One participant seeks clarification on the difference between impedance represented as |z| and z, indicating a desire to understand notation correctly.
  • Examples are provided to illustrate the breakdown of impedance into real and reactive components, with some participants correcting earlier calculations and discussing the implications of these corrections.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of vector notation and the nature of ammeter readings. However, there remains some uncertainty regarding the correct application of magnitude notation and the calculations related to impedance, with differing views on how to represent these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations presented are based on assumptions that may not be explicitly stated, and there are unresolved questions regarding the correct use of notation and the implications of phase angles in circuit analysis.

commelion
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi I have been working on this problem and would like to know if I am close to being correct, I am also having difficulty understanding the difference between knowing when to use (vector and magnitude of a vector) relationships correctly, I give an example of this below.

A inductor and resistor (unknown values) are connected in parallel and supplied with a voltage of 120 volts 60 hz. Find the inductance in milli henries if the circuits amp meter reads 5 amps and its watt meter reads 500 watts

Suggested solution

The watt meter measures real power only, therefore I used the following
R = V^2/P and got 28.8 ohms

Magnitude Z = Magnitude V/ Magnitude I
And got Magnitude Z = 24 ohms

Here why is it important to use the magnitude here and not just Z = V/I from (ohms law) ?
I am having difficulty knowing when the correct notation is needed.

I then tried the following for parallel circuits |Z|^-1 = |R^-1+ jWL^-1|

With some algebra I got the following

(1/jWL)^2 = 11 / 20736
jWL = 43.41 ohms

L = 115 milli henries using 2pi*fL

I think this is close to being right if somebody could check this i would be grateful, for the question about the vectors and magnitude notation I have searched on line for an explanation to no avail, hopefully some one here can help.

thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything is vectors, so always use vector math. (Of course, some problems will all be one-dimensional vectors and have angles and unreal components of value zero, but you're still using vectors!). It is never useful to neglect a non-zero angle or ignore a non-zero unreal component at any point in your calculations, except in the final answer when only the magnitude or real component is specifically all you've been asked for. Only in casual conversation might one use the word "impedance" to imply only the magnitude of the impedance. Technically, and in your test answers, its best to show the vector notation in the answer unless its clear only the magnitude should be specified. For example, it ~might~ be OK to give only magnitudes in answers if your textbook or your teacher regularly uses the word "impedance" to refer only to the magnitude of impedance--but personally I think that wouldn't be a good way to teach, even though admittedly its sometimes used that way in casual conversation.
 
Last edited:
thanks for the help

correct me i i get this wrong please !

so in the circuit problem the amp meter reads 5 amps, this is the magnitude because you do not know the angle. ?

likewise say i was to put the amp meter in series with the resistor this would be entirely real as it has no angle and therefore does not need the magnitude notation ie. |I|.?
 
commelion said:
so in the circuit problem the amp meter reads 5 amps, this is the magnitude because you do not know the angle. ?
Ammeters always read magnitude. That's all they can do; they read the magnitude of the current flowing through them.

likewise say i was to put the amp meter in series with the resistor this would be entirely real as it has no angle and therefore does not need the magnitude notation ie. |I|.?
Ammeters always read magnitude. That's all they can do; they read the magnitude of the current flowing through them. If you put the ammeter in series with anything, or a combination of things, the ammeter always reads the magnitude of the current flowing through the ammeter. It can't do anything else.

It is instructive to imagine you possesses lots of meters, so you can connect ammeters in series with every element in a circuit simultaneously. You might see 3 amps in the resistor, 4 amps in the parallel inductor, yet at the same time only 5 amps total into the circuit. (I just made those figures up, for illustration.) It is up to you to draw the vectors on a sheet of paper; the meters won't do that part of the task for you. :smile:

Ammeters and voltmeters always measure magnitude. * They have only two input terminals, so know nothing about real or reactive. They have no way of referencing one sinusoid with another to see a phase difference.

Wattmeters are clever gadgets. They measure real power, and that tells you how much power is being dissipated in the resistances in your circuit. To manage this feat, wattmeters have more than two input terminals so they can compare the phase of one wave with that of another.
 
Last edited:
so when doing these problems for instance in the question, I've worked out that the (inductor current is 2.76<-90deg) and the (resistor current is 4.17< 0deg)

these can be repersented by Il = 2.76<-90deg and Ir = 4.17<0deg, there is no need to put the magnitude notation ie || on these as the are just vectors, however the tolal amps in the circuit is 5 amps, this should use the magnitude notation ie |It| = 5 amps, I've plotted these and the do indeed make sense, the also make 5 amps when (a^2+b^2=c^2) is used
im particularly interested in getting the notation of magnitude and vectors correct.

for example when faced with the magnitude of impedance (|z|) = 24 ohms from question
whats the difference between |z| and just z anybody ?

thanks for the help so far
 
Examples:
z=34.5 ohms @ angle = +23 degrees
|z| = 34.5 ohms
 
alarm !

sq root of (34.5)^2 + (23)^2 = 41.46 not 34.5

i do understand that my questions here are not of universal importance but everything hinges on me understanding the above ?

thanks in advance
 
Taking my example of an impedance with magnitude 34.5 at angle +23 deg.
It resolves into a real component of 34.5 cos 23 = 31.75 ohms
and a reactive component of 34.5 sin 23 = 1.2 ohms

Since the reactive component is positive we see that it's in the 1st quadrant, hence due to inductance.

So we have a Pythagorean triangle with base 31.75, height 1.2, and hypotenuse 34.5 The magnitude of the impedance is 34.5 ohms.
 
hi

can you show me how you got 1.2 ohms please, i understand now the vectors and magnitude

thanks
 
  • #10
commelion said:
can you show me how you got 1.2 ohms please, i understand now the vectors and magnitude
oops. Looks like a finger fumble when using the calculator. :eek:

Should be:
a reactive component of 34.5 sin 23 = 13.48 ohms

So we have a Pythagorean triangle with base 31.75, height 13.48, and hypotenuse 34.5 The magnitude of the impedance is 34.5 ohms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K