• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

RLC Circuit Differential Equation problem

  • Engineering
  • Thread starter MathsDude69
  • Start date
  • #1

Homework Statement



For a RLC circuit with RC = 1/2 and LC = 1/16 determine the differential equation that describes the relationship between the input and output voltages. An image of the circuit is shown with RLC all in series with the input voltage Vi(t) across all 3 components. The voltage drop across the capacitor is labelled Vo(t)

Homework Equations



Kirchoff's Voltage Law

The Attempt at a Solution



From Kirchoff's voltage law:

Vi(t) = Vr(t) + Vc(t) + Vl(t)

Vr(t) = Rir(t) = RC(Vc(t))' = RC(Vo(t))' Using the prime to indicate differentiation

The voltage drop across the resistor can now be descirbed as above henceforth we now have:

Vi(t) = RC(Vo(t))' + Vc(t) + Vl(t)

Given that Vc(t) = Vo(t) we can also write:

Vi(t) = RC(Vo(t))' + Vo(t) + Vl(t)

The voltage drop across the inductor can be expressed as:

Vl(t) = L(il(t))' and as ir = ic = il Vl(t) = LC(Vo(t))'

Henceforth the differential equation is:

Vi(t) = RC(Vo(t))' + Vo(t) + LC(Vo(t))'





Is this solution correct or have I flamingo'd up somewhere?

Homework Statement





Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
madmike159
Gold Member
369
0
Can you upload the image of the circuit?
 
  • #4
madmike159
Gold Member
369
0
I hate these questions. Have you considered that V = L(di/dt) and i = C(dv/dt)?
 
  • #5
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
14,632
1,268
The voltage drop across the inductor can be expressed as:

Vl(t) = L(il(t))' and as ir = ic = il Vl(t) = LC(Vo(t))
You made a mistake here when you substituted for il.
Henceforth the differential equation is:

Vi(t) = RC(Vo(t))' + Vo(t) + LC(Vo(t))'
This isn't correct either. You will get a second-order equation for an RLC circuit.
 
  • #6
Im guessing then that it should be along the lines of:

L*d2i/dt2 + R*di/dt + 1\C*i

what is confusing is that all the information I have pertains to RL/RC circuits which are first order systems.

Is it even possible to rearrange a second order system such as this to obtain a second order differential equation using only the relationship between voltage and time?

The whole purpose of this exercize is to find the laplace transform and then the laplace frequency response H(s). :-s
 
  • #7
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
14,632
1,268
You almost had it with your original attempt. Just go back and do the math a little more carefully.

How did you go from VL(t)=L(iL(t))', which is correct, to VL(t)=LC(Vo(t)), which is incorrect?
 
Last edited:
  • #8
You almost had it with your original attempt. Just go back and do the math a little more carefully.

How did you go from VL(t)=L(iL(t)), which is correct, to VL(t)=LC(Vo(t)), which is incorrect?
I assumed that in a series connection that the current was equal between all parts, thus the magnitude of the current given by the voltage drop across the capacitor would also indicate the level of current in the inductor. But then again you know what they say about assumption :-p

The only other example I have is an LR circuit which stipulates that:

iL(t) = iL(0-) + 1/L * integral between 0- and t of VL(tau)d(tau) .. (sorry im not too sure how to do the mathematical signs)

Should I sustitue this into the original equation??
 
  • #9
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
14,632
1,268
I assumed that in a series connection that the current was equal between all parts
This is right. It's a consequence of Kirchoff's current law.
thus the magnitude of the current given by the voltage drop across the capacitor would also indicate the level of current in the inductor.
What you mean by this part isn't so clear to me. Could you provide an equation for what you mean?
 
  • #10
Sure. I figured ic(t) = C*(VC(t))'

In my case VC(t) and VO(t) are the same quantity.
 
  • #11
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
14,632
1,268
OK, so VL(t)=L(iL(t))'=L(iC(t))'=...?
 
  • #12
OK, so VL(t)=L(iL(t))'=L(iC(t))'=...?
...erm..... L(C*(Vc(t))'') ??
 
  • #13
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
14,632
1,268
Right, so you end up with

Vi = LC V''o + RC V'o + Vo

which is the second-order differential equation you want.
 
  • #14
Awsome. Thanks alot!
 

Related Threads on RLC Circuit Differential Equation problem

Replies
21
Views
13K
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
713
Replies
11
Views
6K
Top