RLC Circuit: Why is 1st Peak Voltage in Giga Volts?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the unexpectedly high first peak voltage observed in an RLC circuit simulation using the software "Electronic Work Bench." Participants explore the reasons behind the Giga Volt reading and the discrepancies between simulated and expected voltages in the context of circuit behavior and idealizations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the first peak voltage is in Giga Volts, suggesting that it should be zero under damping conditions.
  • Another participant proposes that the high voltage could result from open-circuiting the current source, which may lead to undefined output voltage in the simulator.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that the Giga Volt reading might be a limitation of the simulator, similar to how ideal voltage sources behave under short-circuit conditions.
  • One participant emphasizes the discrepancies between simulation and reality, arguing that simulators are approximations and can produce misleading results, particularly in idealized scenarios.
  • Concerns are raised about the necessity of hand calculations in circuit analysis to avoid blindly trusting simulation results, highlighting the importance of understanding real-world circuit behavior.
  • Another participant suggests incorporating parasitic elements like leakage and resistive losses to achieve more realistic simulation results.
  • A comment is made about the need for caution when using simulators, comparing them to dangerous tools and advocating for preliminary on-paper analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views regarding the validity of simulation results and the implications of idealized circuit models. There is no consensus on the exact cause of the Giga Volt reading, and multiple competing explanations are presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations of the discussion include the reliance on ideal circuit models in simulations, which may not accurately reflect real-world behavior due to factors like parasitics and approximations inherent in the simulation software.

XuFyaN
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
I have design this circuit from the book on the software "Electronic Work Bench" but see the 1st peak voltage in the attached image,

why it is in Giga Volts ?
the 1% of 1st peak voltage should be equal to the last peak voltage but this condition is not fulfilling here ...why ?

i have design another circuit and it is completely fine and i verified the first and last peak voltage and it is correct...buyt in this circuit why it is in Gvolts ?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    18.5 KB · Views: 502
Engineering news on Phys.org
XuFyaN said:
I have design this circuit from the book on the software "Electronic Work Bench" but see the 1st peak voltage in the attached image,

why it is in Giga Volts ?
the 1% of 1st peak voltage should be equal to the last peak voltage but this condition is not fulfilling here ...why ?

i have design another circuit and it is completely fine and i verified the first and last peak voltage and it is correct...buyt in this circuit why it is in Gvolts ?

Looks like you are open-circuiting the current source? That would rail out the voltage, I would think. It would be nice if it gave you an error message for that, though.
 
yes but why the voltage is in GigaVolts ?? it should be 0 ?? and it is under damping circuit
 
XuFyaN said:
yes but why the voltage is in GigaVolts ?? it should be 0 ?? and it is under damping circuit

The output voltage of an open-circuited ideal current source is undefined. The GV value is probably just where it tops out at in the simulator. Much like the short-circuit current of an ideal voltage source, right?
 
XuFyaN said:
yes but why the voltage is in GigaVolts ?? it should be 0 ?? and it is under damping circuit

Welcome to the reality of simulation.

Simulators lie because they are still only approximations of reality and not reality itself.

For the ideal circuit used in the simulator, this answer is probably exactly correct. Just as if you use a differential equation form of the circuit you'll get infinities in impulse and step responses!

But it's not a correct answer for the real world because of the approximation/idealization of the circuit model used the simulator to represent the real world circuit are just that: representations (aka approximations).

All simulators of any type have this problem which why anyone who blindly trusts what a simulator tells them is simply a fool/idiot.

This also why mastering hand-calculations of circuit analysis is still just as absolutely essential today as it was in the days of slide rules and paper calculation. You have to understand the real circuit well enough to recognize when the simulator lying to you.

Your case here is only an unusually obvious case of that mismatch between simulation and reality. Usually it's much more subtle. Knowing about step and impulse responses, you would expect these kinds of high voltages to occur in an idealized analysis.

So the reality is that capacitors do have some leakage (parallel R with every C) and inductors do have resistive losses (series R with every L) and switches do not turn on and off instantaneous and do have series resistance/inductance when closed and parallel capacitance when open. If you change your circuit to incorporate these kinds of 1st, then 2nd, etc. order parasitics, you'll start to get more "realistic" results.

But you'll have a whole lot more parameters to worry about. Welcome to engineering. You either have to trade this or "know" what to ignore from what the simulator is telling you.
 
Simulator operators should require special licences before they are allowed at them. Without a bit of on-paper analysis, first, they are as dangerous as chain saws.

You could reduce the risk of silly results if every Capacitor you use, initially, has a (large) resistor across it and every inductor has a (small) resistor in series. But then What Is Small or Large? Ahh, that's the question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K