Robots and traction on an incline

  • Thread starter Thread starter mgordon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incline Traction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenge of predicting when Lego robots will lose traction while racing up an incline. Key factors include the forces of gravity and friction, specifically how they relate to the robot's weight distribution. The friction force is determined by the perpendicular component of the robot's weight multiplied by the coefficient of friction. A robot is on the verge of slipping when the parallel component of its weight equals the friction force. The teacher plans to conduct experiments to verify these concepts.
mgordon
I'm a high school teacher. I have students competing by racing Lego robots up an incline. I can calculate the force due to friction down the incline and the force of gravity parallel to the plane but am unable to clearly identify the relatioship between these two forces and whether a robot looses traction and begins to spin out. I know that weight distibution is a factor but considering the robot as a point mass, is there a relationship that I'm unaware of. I'd like to be able to predict at what incline a robot will begin to loose traction if the coefficients of friction and the mass of the robot are known.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What class are you teaching?
 
I teach a class called intro to robotics where students learn about a variety of math and science concepts in a lab/hands-on type setting.
 
You will need to separate the weight of the robot into components parallel to and perpendicular to the incline. The friction force is the perpendicular component of weight times the coefficient of friction.

The robot will be on the edge of slipping when the parallel component of weight is equal to the friction force (and will slip as soon as it is larger).
 
Thanks,
That certainly makes sense. I will experiment in an attempt to verify this over the weekend.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top