Roger Penrose's need for a physics Grey area

  • B
  • Thread starter edmund cavendish
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Area Physics
In summary, Roger Penrose's theory of the physics Grey area suggests that there may be a limit to our understanding of the universe, beyond which our current laws of physics may not apply. This theory is supported by phenomena such as black holes, the big bang, and the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. It differs from other theories in physics, such as the multiverse and string theory, by focusing on the limitations of our understanding rather than attempting to explain the mysteries of the universe. If Penrose's theory is correct, it could mean that there is still much more to learn about the universe. The concept of the physics Grey area challenges scientists to think beyond our current understanding and highlights the need for continued research in the field of physics.
  • #1
edmund cavendish
25
8
TL;DR Summary
Roger Penrose has postulated the need for a new physics in the "grey area" between macroscopic and microscopic. Is there such a need and if not why not and if there is what progress have we made toward it. If might end the pointless debate about macroscopic measuring devices?
Many discussions of the so called measurement problem seem to run up against the buffers of the uncertainty of what exisfs ? In the grey area between mjcro and macro scopic. Is there a zone a closing door of some new physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Er.. mesoscopic physics is an active area of physics. Have you looked it up?

There is no "zone a closing door"... whatever that is.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
  • #3
AFAIK there's no empirical evidence for the introduction of new physics in some mesoscopic scale, i.e., there's no known range of applicability of QT seen yet.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby

1. What is Roger Penrose's "need for a physics Grey area"?

Roger Penrose, a renowned mathematician and physicist, believes that there are certain phenomena in the universe that cannot be explained solely by traditional physics theories and require a "Grey area" or a new approach to understanding them.

2. What are some examples of phenomena that fall into this "Grey area"?

Some examples of phenomena that Roger Penrose believes require a "Grey area" in physics include consciousness, the origin of the universe, and the nature of time.

3. Why does Roger Penrose believe that a "Grey area" is necessary in physics?

According to Penrose, traditional physics theories and models are not sufficient to fully explain and understand certain complex phenomena in the universe. He argues that a new approach or a "Grey area" is needed to bridge the gaps in our current understanding.

4. How does Roger Penrose's "need for a physics Grey area" differ from other theories?

Unlike other theories that attempt to explain the same phenomena, Penrose's "need for a physics Grey area" does not rely on mathematical equations or empirical evidence. Instead, it proposes a new way of thinking about these phenomena and challenges our current understanding of the universe.

5. Has Roger Penrose's "need for a physics Grey area" been widely accepted in the scientific community?

While there are some scientists who support Penrose's ideas, his "need for a physics Grey area" is still a controversial topic in the scientific community. Many scientists argue that his theories lack empirical evidence and are not testable, making them difficult to prove or disprove.

Similar threads

B Are Quantum Entities in Macro Sized Objects Entangled?
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
22
Views
2K
Roger Penrose´s OR theory, Consiousness is a QM phenomenon?
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
26
Views
1K
B Does anybody think that there is an underlying reality?
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Who is Penrose Sir Roger Penrose? Insights from His Recent Interviews
    • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
2K
Need Help with Physics Problems? Join the Physics Forum!
    • New Member Introductions
Replies
1
Views
41
I Entanglement vs. Coherence in SPDC
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
20
Views
3K
I Measurement problem - will this work?
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
258
What Makes Physics Fun and Challenging for Scientists?
    • New Member Introductions
Replies
9
Views
426
  • Sticky
B Guidelines for Quantum Physics Forum
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
5K
I Is the Measurement Apparatus made up partly of electrons? Perhaps not.
    • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top