Role of waste disposal for new plants

  • Thread starter Thread starter gildomar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plants
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the significant impact of radioactive waste management on the decision to build nuclear plants, particularly following the halted Yucca Mountain disposal site project. While the existing policy favors a once-through fuel cycle, there is some consideration for recycling spent fuel, which could influence future plant construction. Currently, new nuclear plants are primarily being built at existing sites, with proposals for new locations facing reluctance from non-nuclear utilities, who prefer wind and gas alternatives. Despite potential improvements in waste management, the stigma surrounding nuclear energy remains a barrier. Overall, effective waste disposal solutions could play a crucial role in the future of nuclear energy development.
gildomar
Messages
98
Reaction score
2
I'm curious as to how much of a factor the lack of a sensible way of dealing with the radioactive waste is in regards whether to build a nuclear plant? I mean, the closest that we recently had for an option was the Yucca disposal site until work was stopped. Granted, it wasn't a perfect plan, but it was at least a little better than the various plants just holding the waste on-site. So I was wondering if there was a better option, would more plants be built? Of course, there would still be the stigma in some people's minds of it being a nuclear plant at all, but at least a critique of the plants would be addressed. Barring knowing how to answer to the question, would you have an idea on who to ask about it?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Waste disposal is certainly a consideration, but if a new plant doesn't gain regulatory approval and receive a license to operate, the question is largely academic. Even if the waste could be made to disappear, there are huge capital costs and long construction periods involved in constructing a plant, and not everyone wants to live near a nuke.
 
gildomar said:
I'm curious as to how much of a factor the lack of a sensible way of dealing with the radioactive waste is in regards whether to build a nuclear plant? I mean, the closest that we recently had for an option was the Yucca disposal site until work was stopped. Granted, it wasn't a perfect plan, but it was at least a little better than the various plants just holding the waste on-site. So I was wondering if there was a better option, would more plants be built? Of course, there would still be the stigma in some people's minds of it being a nuclear plant at all, but at least a critique of the plants would be addressed. Barring knowing how to answer to the question, would you have an idea on who to ask about it?
By waste, I believe one is referring to spent fuel. It is waste in the sense that in it's spent fuel form, it would not be productive for continued operation in the reactor.

US spent fuel policy involved recycling at one point to recover the unused uranium and the plutonium produced during operation. However, the recycling option was suspended.

At the moment, the policy (once-through fuel cycle) is to deposit the spent fuel in a repository, although there is some consideration for recycling.

The only new plants under construction are at existing sites. Otherwise, there are proposals by some nuclear utilities to use new sites, e.g., Clinch River site by TVA for an mPower plant.

Non-nuclear utilities have been reluctant to commit to new nuclear plants. Wind and gas seem preferred options.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top