Rollercoaster Physics: Calculating Speed and Energy Transformations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed and energy transformations of a rollercoaster cart with a mass of 55 kg, initially traveling at 5 m/s and reaching a height of 5 m. It explores the speed at the bottom of the track, concluding that without friction, the speed would increase due to energy conservation principles. The observed speed of 10 m/s at the bottom suggests energy loss, likely due to friction or other factors, indicating that not all potential energy was converted into kinetic energy. The energy efficiency of the cart can be calculated by comparing the actual kinetic energy at the bottom to the initial potential energy. Overall, the calculations emphasize the relationship between gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy in rollercoaster dynamics.
gigglesnicole
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Rollercoaster cart (55kg) traveling at a velocity of 5m/s reaches position at top of a rollercoaster hill, 5m high.

1. assuming no friction, what would the speed of the cart be at the bottom of the track?
2. at the bottom, the speedometer of the cart displays a speed of 10m/s. What does this suggest about the energy transformation that has occurred as the cart went down the slope?
3. what is the energy efficiency of the cart as it goes down the slope?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


already calculated
gravitational potential energy: GPE = m*g*h = 2695
kinetic energy: KE = 1/2*m*v^2 = 687.5
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So the total energy of the cart is the sum of the kinetic and gravitational potential energy. That total will stay the same. At the bottom of the track, the potential energy will have declined by mg(h1-h2) and the kinetic energy must increase by the same amount. Once you've calculated the increase in kinetic energy you can calculate the new speed.
 
thanx :) that really helped
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top