Rolling in the Higgs: A Physics-Themed Parody of Adele's "Rolling in the Deep

  • Thread starter Thread starter cephron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Higgs Rolling
cephron
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
(Note to the mods:
This post is a link to an art piece concerning the Higgs boson, and not an actual question. I looked though the boards, trying to figure out the appropriate place to post it, and this board seemed most likely. If it doesn't belong on this board, please forgive me and move it to where it should be. Thanks!)

This physics-themed a capella parody of Adele's "Rolling in the deep" is too good. Apparently, if you read the comments, people at CERN have been watching it! xD
I bet a number of us have seen it already, but for those who haven't...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtItBX1l1VY
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hah! Nice find. Thanks for sharing! Right up my alley: I both majored in physics and directed an a cappella group in college :cool:
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top