Rolling without slipping on a cylindrical surface - need clarification

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mechanics of a hoop rolling without slipping on a cylindrical surface. Amit initially misunderstands the relationship between the angular velocities of the hoop and the cylinder, believing that the center of the hoop moves faster than the contact point. However, the correct analysis reveals that the center of the hoop moves with a linear speed of v_c = \omega_L * r, where r is the radius of the hoop and \omega_L is its angular velocity. The key takeaway is that the hoop's rotation on the cylinder incorporates both its rolling motion and the geometry of the cylinder, leading to a clear understanding of the dynamics involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular velocity and linear velocity concepts
  • Familiarity with rolling motion and the principle of rolling without slipping
  • Basic knowledge of circular geometry and arc length calculations
  • Ability to differentiate equations involving angular motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of rolling motion in physics, focusing on the concept of rolling without slipping
  • Learn about the relationship between angular and linear velocities in circular motion
  • Explore the geometry of circular paths and how they apply to rolling objects
  • Investigate similar mechanical systems, such as the motion of celestial bodies, to understand complex rotational dynamics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rolling motion and rotational mechanics.

klg.amit
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi,

The following is a general question which doesn't have to do with any particular problem. (therefore I am not including the template).
I understand that when a circular object (e.g: a hoop) rolls on a *flat* surface without slipping with angular speed \omega, its contact point, and thereby its center, moves with speed \omega r.
My difficulty is to understand the situation such as a pure roll of a hoop on a cylinder. I would like to understand what is wrong about my following analysis of the situation:

Let the hoop have radius r and the cylinder radius R, then:
1. Let the hoop rotate through an angle \theta then its contact point moved a distance r\theta.
2. Let at the same time the angle from the center of the hoop to the center of the cylinder vary by \varphi then the same distance is R\varphi
3. Therefore r\theta = R\varphi \Rightarrow r\omega=R\dot{\varphi} by differentiating.

However my Professor says that since there is no slipping, the *center* moves with speed r\omega, not the contact point. But according to my analysis, the center should move somewhat faster, since it seems to me that it covers a longer arc than r\theta which the contact point covered after a rotation through \theta.

A clarification: when I say the "contact point moved" I understand that it's changing all the time. I actually refer to the total distance covered by the "bottom" of the hoop.

Your kind help will be very much appreciated,
Amit
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See attached picture.
Assume uniform angular velocities.
The loops rolls upward on the cylinder. At start, its contact point is marked with blue. When the blue dot is contact point again, the loop has a trace of length s on the rim of the cylinder.The length of this trace is equal to the perimeter of the loop,

s=2r\pi

This arc corresponds to the central angle \phi=2r\pi/R<br />

The loop turned by the angle

\theta=2\pi+\phi<br />

during the time when the blue dot made its next contact with the cylinder. If the angular velocity of the loop is wL, this took the time period of

t=(2\pi+\phi)/\omega_L<br /> <br />

The angular velocity of the centre of the loop is

\phi/t= \omega_L\frac{\phi}{(2\pi+\phi)}=\omega_L*\frac{2\pi r/R}{2\pi+2\pi r/R}=\omega_L*\frac{r}{R+r}

The linear velocity of the centre of the loop is


v_c=\omega_L*\frac{r}{R+r}*(R+r)=\omega_L*r

Your teacher is right.


ehild
 
Last edited:
I think I understand now, the hoop rotates through an angle \phi solely on the account of its movement on the cylinder (simply because of the geometry, on flat surfaces this contribution doesn't occur) and through \theta due to rolling without slipping, is that a good way to see it ?

I think that this is the crucial point I failed to understand until now. Then you derived very clearly why this means that the center moves with linear speed wL*r. I thank you.
 
Yes, you see it right. The case of Earth orbiting around the sun and rotating at the same time is a similar case. The day is longer than the period of rotation. Or the Moon: We see the same face all the time, but it completes a full rotation around its axis while completing its orbit around the Earth.

ehild
 
I see, indeed these are good examples of the same thing. Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K