Rolling without slipping on a cylindrical surface - need clarification

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of a hoop rolling without slipping on a cylindrical surface. Participants explore the relationship between angular velocity, linear velocity, and the geometry of motion in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to analyze the motion of a hoop rolling on a cylinder, questioning the relationship between the angular displacement of the hoop and the distance covered by its center. Other participants provide insights into the geometry of the motion and the implications of rolling without slipping.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, with some clarifying the distinction between the motion of the hoop's center and its contact point. There is acknowledgment of the original poster's confusion, and guidance has been provided regarding the relationship between angular velocities and linear speeds.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference geometric considerations that arise specifically in the context of rolling on a curved surface, which differ from those on flat surfaces. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding these differences in motion dynamics.

klg.amit
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi,

The following is a general question which doesn't have to do with any particular problem. (therefore I am not including the template).
I understand that when a circular object (e.g: a hoop) rolls on a *flat* surface without slipping with angular speed [tex]\omega[/tex], its contact point, and thereby its center, moves with speed [tex]\omega r[/tex].
My difficulty is to understand the situation such as a pure roll of a hoop on a cylinder. I would like to understand what is wrong about my following analysis of the situation:

Let the hoop have radius r and the cylinder radius R, then:
1. Let the hoop rotate through an angle [tex]\theta[/tex] then its contact point moved a distance [tex]r\theta[/tex].
2. Let at the same time the angle from the center of the hoop to the center of the cylinder vary by [tex]\varphi[/tex] then the same distance is [tex]R\varphi[/tex]
3. Therefore [tex]r\theta = R\varphi \Rightarrow r\omega=R\dot{\varphi}[/tex] by differentiating.

However my Professor says that since there is no slipping, the *center* moves with speed [tex]r\omega[/tex], not the contact point. But according to my analysis, the center should move somewhat faster, since it seems to me that it covers a longer arc than [tex]r\theta[/tex] which the contact point covered after a rotation through [tex]\theta[/tex].

A clarification: when I say the "contact point moved" I understand that it's changing all the time. I actually refer to the total distance covered by the "bottom" of the hoop.

Your kind help will be very much appreciated,
Amit
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See attached picture.
Assume uniform angular velocities.
The loops rolls upward on the cylinder. At start, its contact point is marked with blue. When the blue dot is contact point again, the loop has a trace of length s on the rim of the cylinder.The length of this trace is equal to the perimeter of the loop,

[tex]s=2r\pi[/tex]

This arc corresponds to the central angle [tex]\phi=2r\pi/R[/tex]

The loop turned by the angle

[tex]\theta=2\pi+\phi[/tex]

during the time when the blue dot made its next contact with the cylinder. If the angular velocity of the loop is wL, this took the time period of

[tex]t=(2\pi+\phi)/\omega_L<br /> [/tex]

The angular velocity of the centre of the loop is

[tex]\phi/t= \omega_L\frac{\phi}{(2\pi+\phi)}=\omega_L*\frac{2\pi r/R}{2\pi+2\pi r/R}=\omega_L*\frac{r}{R+r}[/tex]

The linear velocity of the centre of the loop is


[tex]v_c=\omega_L*\frac{r}{R+r}*(R+r)=\omega_L*r[/tex]

Your teacher is right.


ehild
 
Last edited:
I think I understand now, the hoop rotates through an angle [tex]\phi[/tex] solely on the account of its movement on the cylinder (simply because of the geometry, on flat surfaces this contribution doesn't occur) and through [tex]\theta[/tex] due to rolling without slipping, is that a good way to see it ?

I think that this is the crucial point I failed to understand until now. Then you derived very clearly why this means that the center moves with linear speed wL*r. I thank you.
 
Yes, you see it right. The case of Earth orbiting around the sun and rotating at the same time is a similar case. The day is longer than the period of rotation. Or the Moon: We see the same face all the time, but it completes a full rotation around its axis while completing its orbit around the Earth.

ehild
 
I see, indeed these are good examples of the same thing. Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K