Roots of a 4th degree polynomial

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the roots of the polynomial 3x^4-960x^3+91500x^2-6272000x+501760000. The original poster seeks efficient methods beyond rational roots and expresses frustration with the complexity of the numbers involved. Suggestions include using Newton's method and Ruffini's method, as well as computational tools like Mathematica or Matlab for quicker solutions. There is also mention of Descartes' sign rule, though its utility is questioned. The consensus leans towards numerical approximation methods for practical root finding.
Grantismo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi eveveryone I was just hoping for some quick help on frustrating physics related math problem. I won't go into detail on the actual problem becasue i know i found the correct polynomial but i was wondering if there was any easy way to find the roots to this polynomial:

3x^4-960x^3+91500x^2-6272000x+501760000=f(x)
*sorry i haven't figured out how to use latex or w/e it's called*rational roots seems rather arduous with the numbers involved. Any suggestions?(I know there is only one answer about 125.98 i think but i was wondering if there was a way to find an exact answer algebraically or with calculus or something)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Apart from using Ruffini's method (rational roots) or Newton's method, both which will require time to yield answers, maybe since this isn't a mathematical problem you can use Mathematica, Matlab, etc... for your solutions.

Also you could have tried Descartes' sign rule, but that wouldn't have helped much anyway.
 
rational roots seems rather arduous with the numbers involved.
501760000 isn't a very big number. A computer should be able to factor that before you can blink. It can probably plug every number dividing 501760000 into that polynomial roughly as quickly.


i was wondering if there was a way to find an exact answer algebraically
Is there any reason why you can't simply define r to be a root of that polynomial, and then work with r?
 
Last edited:
I don't think that the roots are rational now that I've looked at a it or a while,
Cyclovenom if you could explain any of those methods i might try them.
 
Grantismo said:
I don't think that the roots are rational now that I've looked at a it or a while,
Cyclovenom if you could explain any of those methods i might try them.

Certainly, i will try to answer any questions about the methods, but they are explained in these sites:

Newton's Method

http://www.ugrad.math.ubc.ca/coursedoc/math100/notes/approx/Newton.html"

http://www.sosmath.com/calculus/diff/der07/der07.html"

Ruffini's Method

"[URL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
wow, the Newton method is PERFECT for what I wanted, plus it will also give my teacher a huge laugh (inside joke about approximations)
Thank you SOO much :)
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top