Roots of a third degree polynomial

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a polynomial equation of the form X^n - px^2 = q^m, which is stated to have three positive real roots a, b, and c. The task is to evaluate the expression log_q[abc(a^2+b^2+c^2)^{a+b+c}]. The discussion centers around the implications of the coefficients and the nature of the roots in relation to the polynomial's degree.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the variables and coefficients, questioning whether X is a typo for x and discussing the implications of the coefficients on the polynomial's degree. Some participants attempt to derive relationships between the roots and coefficients based on polynomial properties.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants suggest that the notation may be incorrect, while others express uncertainty about the implications of the coefficients. There is no clear consensus on the nature of X or the degree of the polynomial, and participants are considering reaching out for clarification.

Contextual Notes

There is ambiguity regarding the notation used in the problem statement, particularly concerning the variables X and x, as well as the degree n of the polynomial. Participants note that the absence of certain coefficients may affect the interpretation of the roots and their properties.

V0ODO0CH1LD
Messages
278
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Knowing that the equation:
[tex]X^n-px^2=q^m[/tex]
has three positive real roots a, b and c. Then what is
[tex]log_q[abc(a^2+b^2+c^2)^{a+b+c}][/tex]
equal to?

Homework Equations



[tex]a + b + c = -(coefficient \ of \ second \ highest \ degree \ term) = -k_2[/tex]

[tex]abc = -(constant \ coefficient) = k_4[/tex]

[tex]a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = (coefficient \ of \ second \ highest \ degree \ term)^2-(coefficient \ of \ third \ highest \ degree \ term) = k^2_2-2k_3[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



First I assumed X^3 is equal to k_1x^3 and so x^3 = X^3/k_1.

[tex]X^n-px^2=q^m\\<br /> x^3-\frac{p}{k_1}x^2-\frac{q^m}{k_1}=0\\<br /> k_2=-\frac{p}{k_1}\\<br /> k_3=0\\<br /> k_4=-\frac{q^m}{k_1}\\<br /> a+b+c=\frac{p}{k_1}\\<br /> abc=\frac{q^m}{k_1}\\<br /> a^2+b^2+c^2=\frac{p^2}{k^2_1}\\[/tex]
[tex]log_q[abc(a^2+b^2+c^2)^{a+b+c}]=\\<br /> \frac{q^m}{k_1}(\frac{p^2}{k^2_1})^{\frac{p}{k_1}}=\\<br /> log_q\frac{q^mp^{\frac{2p}{k_1}}}{k_1^{1+\frac{2p}{k_1}}}=\\<br /> log_qq^mp^{\frac{2p}{k_1}}-log_qk_1^{1+\frac{2p}{k_1}}=\\<br /> log_qq^m+log_qp^{\frac{2p}{k_1}}-log_qk_1^{1+\frac{2p}{k_1}}=\\<br /> m+\frac{2p}{k_1}log_qp-(1+\frac{2p}{k_1})log_qk_1=\\[/tex]

If I substitute (X^3)/(x^3) for k_1 I have an equation that only resembles the possible answers if X = x or X = -x, which makes me think that either X was a typo and they meant x. Or that somewhere in the problem statement they tell you about something that according to some property of polynomials makes X = x or X = -x implied.

Is there some weird property of polynomial that I don't know that would help me solve this problem? What is it?

EDIT: Sorry for the latex error..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think x and X mean the same, otherwise it would be explained.
And your solution is correct.

ehild
 
ehild said:
I think x and X mean the same, otherwise it would be explained.
And your solution is correct.

ehild

Doesn't the fact that the coefficient on the x^1 term is 0 mean that the coefficient on the x^3 term has to be zero or something of that nature?

EDIT: Doesn't the fact that the coefficient on the x^1 term is 0 mean that the coefficient on the x^3 term has to be ONE or something of that nature?
 
V0ODO0CH1LD said:
EDIT: Doesn't the fact that the coefficient on the x^1 term is 0 mean that the coefficient on the x^3 term has to be ONE or something of that nature?

Since there is no x term, but there is an x2 term, it is reasonable to assume that the coefficient of x is 0. However, you can't assume that xn means x3. You are given this statement:
xn - px2 = qm has three positive real roots a, b and c. That doesn't necessarily imply that the equation is a cubic. What this says to me is that of all roots, three of them are real and positive. Any other roots could be negative or nonreal.
 
Mark44 said:
Since there is no x term, but there is an x2 term, it is reasonable to assume that the coefficient of x is 0. However, you can't assume that xn means x3. You are given this statement:
xn - px2 = qm has three positive real roots a, b and c. That doesn't necessarily imply that the equation is a cubic. What this says to me is that of all roots, three of them are real and positive. Any other roots could be negative or nonreal.

I haven't thought of it like that, but you have a point. How would I proceed then? Do I actually have to find the real roots? I have no clue as to how I am supposed to do this now..

EDIT: No, I am sorry! I re-red the thread and realized something! There is a typo in the problem statement X^n is actually X^3! But couldn't X^3 mean x^(anything) if X ≠ x anyway?
 
It is said that the roots of the equation are a, b, c. If X is not x it should be specified. Do not worry, it must be just a typo. Word starts a line with a capital letter, that can be the reason.

ehild
 
ehild said:
It is said that the roots of the equation are a, b, c. If X is not x it should be specified. Do not worry, it must be just a typo. Word starts a line with a capital letter, that can be the reason.

ehild

Okay, but doesn't the fact that the coefficient on the x1 term is zero mean anything at all? Assuming for a second that X ≠ x; then [itex]k_1(x-a)(x–b)(x–c)=k_1x^3-k_1(a+b+c)x^2+k_1(ab+ac+bc)x-k_1(abc)=X^3-px^2-q^m[/itex]
Doesn't that mean that:

[tex]k_1x^3 = X^3\\<br /> k_1(a+b+c)=p\\<br /> k_1(ab+ac+bc)=0\\<br /> k_1(abc)=q^m[/tex]

k_1 can't be zero otherwise the whole equation would be zero. So isn't there a way to prove that X = x maybe using the fact that a, b and c are positive? And how can "k_1 (ab + ac + bc) = 0" if a,b and c are positive and k_1 ≠ 0?
 
I believe that X is a typo, and should be x, which makes this the equation:
x3 -px2 = qm, with a, b, anc c being positive real roots.

Then
a3 -pa2 = qm
b3 -pb2 = qm
c3 -pc2 = qm

So

a2 = ##\frac{q^m}{a - p} ##
b2 = ##\frac{q^m}{b - p} ##
c2 = ##\frac{q^m}{c - p} ##

Substitute these into your log expression and use the properties of logs to simplify it as much as possible.
 
The only thing keeping me from accepting that X is a typo is that x3 -px2 = qm does not have three real positive roots. Maybe I could find a condition on X for X3 -px2 = qm to have three positive real roots. But I don't know how to..
 
  • #10
You are right, the roots of x3 -px2 = qm can not be all positive. If X is some function of x, X3-px2 - qm=f(x)(x-a)(x-b)(x-c) where a, b, c are positive and f(x)=0 does not have positive roots. That means X3=f(x)(x-a)(x-b)(x-c) +px2 + qm, f(x) can be anything which does not have positive roots. But then you can not solve the problem.

I think it is just a badly worded problem. Instead of "all roots are positive" it should be "the product of the three roots is positive".

ehild
 
  • #11
V0ODO0CH1LD, I think that you should ask your instructor for clarification on this problem. We are 11 posts into this thread, and still can't tell if X is the same as or different from x, whether it's X3 or Xn (or x3 or xn), and whether the three roots are positive or their product is positive.

Please check with you instructor as to exactly what is given in this problem. Until then, I'm done with it.
 
  • #12
I just sent an email to my professor, I will post his answer as soon as I receive it.
 
  • #13
I'm pretty sure that the capitol X is just a typo, otherwise the question is not well defined.

More concerning to me is the "n". As Mark44 has pointed out, just because we're given that there are 3 real roots doesn't mean that there are only three roots and that therefore n=3.

However, if we are not able to assume that n=3, and if there may be other (non positive real) roots, then I don't think that this is a do-able problem. So I think that there is yet another typo (or poorly a worded part of question). Where it says "... has three positive real roots a, b and c", I believe that what the questioner *intended* to say was, "... has three roots a,b and c, all of which are positive real".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K