Roots of series of exponential raised to power of x?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the equation a1e-k1x + a2e-k2x + ... + ane-knx = 0 for x, particularly when n > 2. The initial solution for n=1 or n=2 is x = In(a1/a2) / (k1-k2), but complications arise when a1 and a2 do not have opposite signs, necessitating the introduction of complex numbers. For n > 2, the equation can be transformed into a polynomial form by substituting y = e^(-x), leading to a polynomial in y that may not be easily solvable. The conversation also touches on the challenges of solving fifth-degree polynomials, emphasizing that there is no general solution for such equations, and numerical methods are often required. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of exponential equations and polynomial roots in mathematical problem-solving.
Adel Makram
Messages
632
Reaction score
15
How to solve: a1e-k1x+a2e-k2x+...+ane-knx =0 for x?

For example in simple case of n=1,2.
a1e-k1x+a2e-k2x=0
the solution will be x=In (a1/a2) / [ k1-k2]. But for terms >2 what will be the solution?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Adel Makram said:
the solution will be x=In (a1/a2) / [ k1-k2].
No. Rewrite the equation: a_{1}e^{-k_{1}x}=-a_{2}e^{-k_{2}x} and you see that for your formula to work, a1 and a2 must have opposite signs. Otherwise you need to introduce somewhere.
 
yes agree, it was a typing mistakes, sorry. because In(negative number) does not exist.

So, again what will be the case if n>2?
 
Let y = e-x. If the k's are integers you have a polynomial in y, which may or may not be readily solvable.
 
mathman said:
Let y = e-x. If the k's are integers you have a polynomial in y, which may or may not be readily solvable.
So how can we solve that too? all e-k are raised to the power of x, likewise all y(s) in your definition are raised to the power of kx, so it is not a power series!
 
Adel Makram said:
So how can we solve that too? all e-k are raised to the power of x, likewise all y(s) in your definition are raised to the power of kx, so it is not a power series!
e^{-kx}=(e^{-x})^{k}
 
Adel Makram said:
So how can we solve that too? all e-k are raised to the power of x, likewise all y(s) in your definition are raised to the power of kx, so it is not a power series!
You seem thoroughly confused! I said you get a polynomial, not a power series. The point of the original question is that the k's are different (integers?). Raising all e-k to the x power doesn't get you anywhere.
 
Adel Makram said:
How to solve: a1e-k1x+a2e-k2x+...+ane-knx =0 for x?

Let y=ex then
e-kix=y-ki
you get
a1y-k1+a2y-k2+...+any-kn =0
or for z=1/y=1/e-x
a1zk1+a2zk2+...+anzkn =0
you got polynomial.now ask yourself about x5-x-1=0
go here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galois_theory
to section
"A non-solvable quintic example"
 
why Fenix said:
Let y=ex then
e-kix=y-ki
you get
a1y-k1+a2y-k2+...+any-kn =0
or for z=1/y=1/e-x
a1zk1+a2zk2+...+anzkn =0
you got polynomial.now ask yourself about x5-x-1=0
go here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galois_theory
to section
"A non-solvable quintic example"
So how we can solve polynomial of 5th degree? and how can we calculate the roots of characteristics polynomial in problem of diagonalization of matrix of rank n>5 for example?
 
  • #10
Adel Makram said:
So how we can solve polynomial of 5th degree? and how can we calculate the roots of characteristics polynomial in problem of diagonalization of matrix of rank n>5 for example?
Because people making examples, problems, tasks, are not monsters, and usually polynomials have integer roots like {0,1,-1,2,-2,3,-3} or √2 or it combination with irrational i, that you can guess, or get close to guessing by looking at derivatives and how function is running.

Polynomial of 5th degree x5-x-1=0 is not looking scary. So why don't you solve it?
 
  • #11
The basic theorem is that there is no general solution for polynomials of fifth degree or higher. In practice, numerical methods are used when a specific equation is being solved.
 
  • #12
mathman said:
The basic theorem is that there is no general solution for polynomials of fifth degree or higher. In practice, numerical methods are used when a specific equation is being solved.

I have a polynomial of k where k could be integers or rationals, so how to solve a polynomial let`s say:
a1x11/4+a2x9/5+a3x7/3=0

in fact my problem is as follow:
a1x(1+2f)+a2x(1+f)+a3x(2+f)+a4xf+a5x=0

Where practically 1/2 <f<2
 
  • #13
It looks like you would need to use numerical methods.
 
  • #14
Adel Makram said:
in fact my problem is as follow:
a1x(1+2f)+a2x(1+f)+a3x(2+f)+a4xf+a5x=0
Where practically 1/2 <f<2

so at first post you wanted to solve something like this?
a1e(1+2f)x+a2e(1+f)x+a3e(2+f)x+a4efx+a5ex=0
by
##e^z=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{z^n}{n!}##
we get
##\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{a_1((1+2f)x)^n+a_2((1+f)x)^n+a_3((2+f)x)^n+a_4(fx)^n+a_5x^n}{n!}=0##
##\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{a_1(1+2f)^nx^n+a_2(1+f)^nx^n+a_3(2+f)^nx^n+a_4f^nx^n+a_5x^n}{n!}=0##
##A=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{[a_1(1+2f)^n+a_2(1+f)^n+a_3(2+f)^n+a_4f^n+a_5]x^n}{n!}=0##
for fixed f ##\in (0.5,2)##
from Schwarz for ##a_n, b_n \in ℝ##
##|\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} a_n b_n|^2 \leq \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} |a_n|^2\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} |b_n|^2 ##
or some other way i think you have to show that ##a_1(1+2f)^n+a_2(1+f)^n+a_3(2+f)^n+a_4f^n+a_5=0## for every n if A=0.
I am not sure is it true.
Then you will get equations for every n...
##a_1(1+2f)+a_2(1+f)+a_3(2+f)+a_4f+a_5=0##
##a_1(1+2f)^2+a_2(1+f)^2+a_3(2+f)^2+a_4f^2+a_5=0##
.
..
...
hope it helps...
 

Similar threads

Back
Top