Does a Spinning Ball Always Have a Faster Point of Rotation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skhandelwal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Rotational
AI Thread Summary
A spinning ball has a defined axis of rotation, with the points where the axis meets the surface being stationary and the equator moving fastest. While the RPM is uniform across the sphere, the airspeed differential created by the ball's spin influences its trajectory, particularly in baseball, where it curves due to differences in air pressure. The Magnus effect explains this curvature, as faster airspeed on one side of the ball results in a pressure difference that alters its path. The fastest point on the ball is directly opposite the slowest point, and understanding the relationship between RPM and airspeed is crucial for analyzing motion. The discussion highlights the importance of air dynamics in the behavior of spinning objects.
Skhandelwal
Messages
400
Reaction score
3
When a ball spins...does it always have one point which is spinning faster? Meaning is it possible for a spinning ball to have an axis at center? If one part is spinning faster...then is the slowing spinning part directly opposite(180 degrees) to that point?
When the fastest point is spinning at 30rpm, how can determine the speed of slowest point?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
axis of rotation

I don't really understand this question. :confused:

A spinning sphere always has an axis of rotation. The two points where that axis meets the surface of the sphere will be stationary (so they will be moving the slowest)(and so, of course, wil be the points on the axis inside the sphere). The "equator" half-way between them will be moving fastest.

But the rpm is the same for every point on the sphere - if the equator is spinning at 30rpm, then so is the remainder of the sphere (including the points inside).
 
really...but I was told that the ball curves is b/c parts of is spinning faster than the other...(I am not a talking about a tilted ball) The difference in air pressure creates the curvature...
 
curve of a spinning baseball

Skhandelwal said:
really...but I was told that the ball curves is b/c parts of is spinning faster than the other...(I am not a talking about a tilted ball) The difference in air pressure creates the curvature...

Ah! You're talking about the spin that a pitcher puts on a baseball, that makes it curve in flight! :smile:

Yes, it's like the flow over an aeroplane wing - the flow over the top of the wing is faster than the flow under it, and that creates a difference in air pressure, which lifts the wing (I think I've got that the right way round).

Similarly, if the baseball is spinning clockwise, then the points on the left will be going slightly faster than the centre of the ball, and the points on the right will be going slightly slower, so the air is going faster on the left than on the right, and so the ball will curve to the … left (I think).

Skhandelwal said:
If one part is spinning faster...then is the slowing spinning part directly opposite(180 degrees) to that point?

If by "spinning" you mean "moving", then yes - velocity is "additive", so if the velocity of the centre of the ball is V, and the velocity of a particular point on the surface is V + W, then the velocity of the opposite point must be V - W.

In particular, the fastest point is always directly (180 degrees) opposite to the slowest point. :smile:

When the fastest point is spinning at 30rpm, how can determine the speed of slowest point?

rpm isn't a speed. You need fps.
 
Skhandelwal said:
really...but I was told that the ball curves is b/c parts of is spinning faster than the other...(I am not a talking about a tilted ball) The difference in air pressure creates the curvature...

You sometime need to really sit down first and think about what you are saying here. It makes no sense to say "parts of the ball is spinning faster than the other". How can that occur for a rigid body in this simple situation?

What is relevant here is the air speed that is flowing over the different parts of the surface as the ball spins and moves through the air. This is where there is a difference in different parts of the ball.

Zz.
 
tiny-tim said:
Ah! You're talking about the spin that a pitcher puts on a baseball, that makes it curve in flight!

That's Magnus effect. One explanation is the thin layer of air attached to the spinning ball, creates a direct differential in air speed relative to the ball, accelerating some air perpendicular to the path of the ball which causes the ball to accelerate in the opposing direction, which causes the curve. The first link below mentions this and includes a diagram of "top spin", the net effects are air is accelerated upwards, so the ball is accelerated downwards. The other explanation is that the layer of air attached to the ball is too thin to be directly responsible for "lift", but causes the air flow around the ball to detach on the forward moving side sooner than the backwards moving side of a ball. The second link mentions this and includes a diagram of "back spin", air is accelerated downwards and the ball is accelerated upwards.

Airspeed diffferential explanation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_effect

Seperation of air stream explanation:
http://www.geocities.com/k_achutarao/MAGNUS/magnus.html

Like the flow over an aeroplane wing - the flow over the top of the wing is faster than the flow under it, and that creates a difference in air pressure, which lifts the wing.
Using the air itself as a frame of reference, the horizontal flow over the top of the wing is slower than the horizontal flow below the wing. However, with the air as a frame of reference, the dominant component of air flow is downwards (corresponding to lift), with a smaller component of air flow forwards (corresponding to drag).

Unlike the spinning ball, where separation of air streams seems to be the more likely explanation of spinning ball "lift", wings simply have an effective angle of attack which when combined with air speed, accelerates the air downwards. For a "normal" wing design, most of this downwards acceleration of air occurs above the wing, partly because the low pressure area above the wing "steals" some of the air flow that would go under the wing. However there are wings with flat tops, curved bottoms that fly just fine, as in this case of some pre-shuttle prototypes for space re-entry vehicles called flying bodies:

M2-F2 with F104 chase plane.jpg

From this web site:

http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Photo/index.html

The M2-F2 was a glider prototype for the M2-F3 which was powered by a rocket engine and achieved speeds of mach 1.6, so in spite of it's appearance, it wasn't a high drag wing. The main change to the M2-F3 was to add a 3rd vertical stabilizer at the back.
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top