Rotational Dynamics - Algebra Based

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges faced in understanding rotational dynamics, particularly in the context of a statics problem involving a board leaning against a wall. The key issue is determining the smallest angle theta at which the board does not slide, given a specific coefficient of static friction. It is emphasized that this problem is rooted in statics, where acceleration is not a factor, and understanding the forces acting on the board is crucial. Participants are encouraged to provide their attempted solutions to facilitate assistance. Overall, grasping the concepts of forces and their application is essential for solving such problems in algebra-based physics.
physicistj
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to get ready for my final and rotational dynamics seems to be very difficult for me. I have read the book and feel like I am just not comprehending what the concepts are. Here is a problem I am stuck on.

A uniform board is leaning against a smooth vertical wall. The board is at an angle theta above the horizontal ground. The coefficient of static friction between the ground and the lower end of the board is 0.650. Find the smallest value for the angle theta, such that the lower end of the board does not slide along the ground.

Again, this is algebra based physics, and if someone does have a solution, can you please explain maybe the concept of rotational dynamics as well?

Thank you so much,
Lost
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, you should understand that this problem is a statics problem, not a dynamics problem. For your purposes, then, acceleration vanishes (i.e. in Newton's second law). For the translational version, all you need to determine are the forces that act on the object (the board). However, for the rotational part, you need to know these same forces, and where they are applied to the body.

BTW, you must show us an attempted solution before we help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top