Rotational Dynamics: Moment of Inertia of 0.44 kg Meter Stick

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia of a 0.44 kg meter stick rotating about a vertical axis at the 30 cm mark. The initial calculation using I = mr^2 yielded 0.1628 kg.m^2, but participants pointed out the need for the correct formula for a rod's rotational inertia. The correct formula is I = 1/3ML^2, leading to confusion over calculations, with varying results proposed. Ultimately, the correct moment of inertia was debated, with final answers ranging from 0.054 kg.m^2 to 0.064 kg.m^2. Participants emphasized the importance of showing work and using the appropriate formulas for accurate results.
PhysicsDud
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Wanted to check this question also:

A meter stick of mass 0.44 kg rotates, in the horizontal plane, about a vertical
axis passing through the 30 cm mark. What is the moment of inertia of the stick?
(Treat it as a long uniform rod)

Answer: I = 0.1628 kg.m^2

Correct??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rather than just give your answer, always show how you got your answer. (At least give the formulas that you used.) I assume you meant to calculate the moment of inertia about that axis.
 
My Work

So I was a little confused but I calculated using the formula I = mr^2 for both sides of the stick and then added them:

I = (0.132 kg)(0.3m)^2 + (0.308 kg)(0.7m)^2
= 0.1628 kg.m^2
 
What's the rotational inertia of a rod about one end? It's not I = m L^2 (where L is the length of the rod).
 
Inertia through end of uniform rod

That formula is I = 1/3ML^2

So the answer is 0.147 kg.m^2 ??
 
You have the correct formula for the rotational inertia, but recheck your calculation.
 
Is the correct answer 0.0132 kg.m^2

Using 0.3m for the Length?
 
In post #3 you showed your work using the incorrect formula for rotational inertia. How would you modify that calculation using the correct formula?
 
Ok hopefully I've got it this time

I = 1/3 ML1^2 + 1/3 ML2^2
= 1/3 (.132)(.3)^2 + 1/3 (.308)(.7)^2
= 0.064 kg.m^2
 
  • #10
Your method is correct, but I suspect a typo in your final answer. (I get 0.054)
 
  • #11
Thank You!

Thanks so much for your help!
 
Back
Top