Rotational Inertia of a triangle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the rotational inertia of a right triangle-shaped vane about a vertical axis through its apex. The correct formula for the inertia is identified as b^2M/2, but there is confusion regarding the definition of the axis. Clarification is needed on whether the axis is perpendicular to the triangle's plane or coplanar with it. Participants emphasize the importance of measuring distances correctly from the axis rather than the apex. The conversation highlights the nuances in interpreting the problem statement and the implications for the solution.
rpthomps
Messages
182
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement



A thin, uniform vane of mass M is in the shape of a right triangle, as shown. Find the rotational inertia about a vertical axis through its apex, as shown in the figure. Express your answer in terms of the triangle’s base width b and its mass M.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Question.jpg


The answer in the back is just ##b^2M/2## without the second term.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not clear what is meant by "a vertical axis through the apex". Your answer looks correct if the vertical axis is perpendicular to the plane of the triangle and passes through the lower left vertex of the triangle in your drawing. The answer in the back of the text appears to be correct if the axis is in the plane of the triangle, passes through the lower left vertex, and is perpendicular to the base b.
 
  • Like
Likes rpthomps
Okay, thanks for looking it over.
 
The word 'vane' implies to me that the axis is coplanar with the lamina.
rpthomps, your r is wrong. You want the distance from the axis, not the distance from the apex.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top