Rotational Inertia Seesaw Picot

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the rotational inertia of a seesaw system with Alice and Bonnie at specified distances from the pivot. The user expresses confusion regarding the calculation of Bonnie's contribution to the rotational inertia, questioning why it is calculated as 25 kg instead of 400 kg/m². Clarification is provided that the radius used in the inertia formula should be measured from the pivot point, not the end of the seesaw. The correct approach involves using the distance from the pivot to each mass when calculating their contributions to the total inertia. Understanding this concept is crucial for accurately determining the rotational inertia of the system.
premedonna89
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
CORRECTION ON TITLE: it should be "Rotational Inertia Seesaw Pivot"

Homework Statement



Alice (20kg) and Bonnie (25kg) sit on seesaw (10m long, 12 kg mass). Pivot of seesaw is in the middle. In order for the seesaw to stay level we determined (in the previous step of the multi-part problem) that Bonnie has to sit 4 m away from the pivot/center.

What is the rotational inertia of this system about the seesaw pivot?

Homework Equations



Inet = Ia + Ig + Ib

I = mass x radius^2^

Ig = 1/12 x mass x length^2^

The Attempt at a Solution



I actually have the answer already (this is a practice exam). But I don't understand how he got it.

Inet = Ia + Ig + Ib

Inet = mass,a x radius,a^2^ + 1/12 x mass x length^2^ + mass,b x radius,b^2^

Inet = 500 + 100 + 25

Inet = 625 kg/m^2^

I don't understand how:

mass,b x radius,b^2^ = 25

Shouldn't it be: 25 x 4^2^ = 400 ?

I imagine radius, b = 1, therefore 1 square is just 1. Since Bonnie is sitting 4 meters away from the center, and the edge is 5 meters away from the center, so 5 minus 4 = 1. Then multiply that by 25 kg to get 25. However, I can't find anywhere in the textbook section for inertia that says to measure radius from the end of the seesaw (?) rather than from the center/pivot.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can of course calculate the moment of inertia with respect to any point (and the result is different for different points) but you're right about this making no sense at all. The distance in your formulas is indeed the distance from the point where you wish to calculate I.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top