Rotational Inertial and Torque question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular speed of a top with a given moment of inertia when a string is pulled with constant tension. The initial challenge is converting linear distance to angular distance, with torque and acceleration being key calculations. A participant realizes that without the radius of the peg, the problem lacks sufficient information for a complete solution. A formula is suggested to find the angular speed, emphasizing the importance of unit consistency. Ultimately, the participant acknowledges their earlier oversight in the calculations.
skinnyabbey
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me out? :smile:

The top has a moment of inertia
of 0:0002 kg.m2 and is initially at rest. It is
free to rotate about a stationary axis AA'. A
string, wrapped around a peg along the axis
of the top, is pulled in such a manner as to
maintain a constant tension of 5.22 N in the string.
If the string does not slip while wound
around the peg, what is the angular speed
of the top after 82.1 cm of string has been
pulled off the peg? Answer in units of rad/s


I have a problem with this question. I don't know how to calculate the linear distance given to an angular distance. I found the acceleration first using Torque=(I*acc). But then I don't know what to do next after this. My acceleration turned out to be 26100 rad/s^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in order to check your torque, we knweed to know the radius of the peg.
edit:

aha! by reverse engineering I have discovered that you have used the force as the torque (unless the radius of the peg is 1 meter, which I doubt).

If the radius of the peg (that the string is wrapped around) is not given, then there is not enough information to solve this problem.
\tau = I \alpha
\tau = Fr
Fr = I \alpha
 
Last edited:
Try square root of [(2*Tension*String Length)/(Moment of Inertia)] .
 
also watch your units... (i.e. make sure length is in m NOT cm)
 
thanks.it worked.
 
D'oh!

"i've made a huge mistake."
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top