Rotational Mechanics: Calculating Torque as a Function of Time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the torque exerted by a hamster on an exercise wheel, given a specific angular velocity function. The user initially derived the torque using the relationship τ = Iα and differentiated the angular velocity to find angular acceleration. The resulting torque function was τ(t) = 2250t² + 4000/r. However, a correction was noted regarding the application of Newton's second law for rotation versus translation, emphasizing the importance of using τ = Iα correctly. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in applying rotational dynamics principles.
PoofyHair
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Hopefully this is in the correct place.
I am presented with a the following problem.
"A hamster running on an exercise wheel, exterts a torque on the wheel. If the wheel has an angular velocity that can be expressed as:
\omega(t)= 3.0 rads/s + (8.0 rad/s^{}2)t + (1.5 rad/s^{}4)t^{}3. Calculate the torque on the wheel as a function of time. Assume that the moment of inertia is 500 kg*m^{}2 and is constant."

\tau=Fr F=m\alpha and I=mr^{}2

I then said that \tau=m\alphar. Next I set I=mr^{}2 equal to m and plugged it into \tau=m\alphar.
I got \tau=I\alpha/r.

After that I differentiated the angular velocity and got \alpha(t)=8.0 + 3(1.5)t^{}2. I plugged it in \tau=I\alpha/r and solved. My end result is: \tau(t)=2250t^{}2 + 4000/r.

Is this correctly done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PoofyHair said:
F=m\alpha
One error is mixing up Newton's 2nd law for rotation and translation.
For translation:
F = m a
For rotation:
\tau = I \alpha
 
Ok, thank you very much.
 
PoofyHair said:
Hello,

Hopefully this is in the correct place.
I am presented with a the following problem.
"A hamster running on an exercise wheel, exterts a torque on the wheel. If the wheel has an angular velocity that can be expressed as:
\omega(t)= 3.0 rads/s + (8.0 rad/s^{}2)t + (1.5 rad/s^{}4)t^{}3. Calculate the torque on the wheel as a function of time. Assume that the moment of inertia is 500 kg*m^{}2 and is constant."

\tau=Fr F=m\alpha and I=mr^{}2

I then said that \tau=m\alphar. Next I set I=mr^{}2 equal to m and plugged it into \tau=m\alphar.
I got \tau=I\alpha/r.

After that I differentiated the angular velocity and got \alpha(t)=8.0 + 3(1.5)t^{}2. I plugged it in \tau=I\alpha/r and solved. My end result is: \tau(t)=2250t^{}2 + 4000/r.

Is this correctly done?

NO

L=IA=Id(w)/dt=I(8+9/2t^2)
A=angular acceleration
w=angular velocity
I=momentum of inertia=mr^2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top