Rotational Motion of Masses Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics lab focused on rotational motion, where the student struggles with analyzing the moment of inertia of slotted masses, which are not point masses. They need to apply the parallel-axis theorem to derive a more accurate moment of inertia for these masses modeled as disks of uniform density. The conversation highlights the importance of including the effects of the slots in their calculations. Participants emphasize the need for the student to show their work to receive more targeted assistance. The urgency of the assignment adds pressure to find a solution quickly.
wizzpowa
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hey all - I'm doing a physics lab on rotational motion, and I can not make sense of the last part, the additional analysis. The question is:

Since our masses are not actually point-masses, the theoretical model I = MR^2 is not very accurate, so for a better theoretical comparison we
should assume that each of the slotted masses is a disk of uniform density (neglect the effect of the slot) instead of a point mass. The moment of inertia for a single disk about an axis through the center of mass and parallel to the face of the disk is shown in the figure at right, where M is the mass of the disk, R is the radius of the disk and L is the thickness of the disk. You will need to use the parallel-axis theorem, check your textbook for details. Is this theoretical value in better agreement with the experimental data? Can you derive an equation to determine the moment of inertia of the masses including the cut-out slots? How does this value compare to the measured moment of inertia?

This is due in the next hour and a half, and I've been trying to make sense of it for over an hour. How can we equate the parallel-axis theorem to what they give us in the problem?

Homework Equations



τ = r x F
τ = I α
I = I (cm) + Mh^2
I = I(0) + Ii
I (cm) = (1/4)Mr^2 + (1/3)ML^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Because it is more of a conceptual problem, I am not sure where to even start. If someone could help me out, it would mean a lot! Thanks! If you need more information about the lab, let me know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi wizzpowa! :smile:

hmm … half an hour to go …

i'm not sure what your question is :confused:

if the mass is a disc of mass m and diameter r at distance R from the centre of rotation, O,

then the moment of inertia IO about O is mR2 plus IC, the moment of inertia about the centre of the disc, C,

and τC = ICα :wink:
 
hi wizzpowa! :smile:

thanks for the pm

as always on this forum, you need to show us your work!

(or at least the bit that's bothering you)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top