Rotational–vibrational coupling scale model

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interest in creating a scale model of rotational-vibrational coupling, a concept in molecular chemistry. Participants express skepticism about the availability of such models in chemistry supply stores, suggesting that building one may be necessary. There is a debate about the effectiveness of a model, given that molecular vibrational states are quantized, which complicates the representation of these phenomena. Despite this, the idea of a model is still considered valuable for educational purposes, particularly in illustrating how spring constants influence rotation and how rotational speed impacts vibration amplitude. The conversation also touches on the potential for using simple materials to create a 2D representation, emphasizing the educational benefits of visualizing these concepts.
Dr Lots-o'watts
Messages
645
Reaction score
0
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You have to build it... and fly it into space on the Shuttle! Of course, you could build your own rocket or try to earn a ride on a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vomit_Comet"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dr Lots-o'watts said:
Do chemistry supply stores sell any? For educationnal purposes? Or do I have to build one?

Wouldn't really work as a good model, considering the molecular vibrational states are quantized. (and we like to pretend rotational-vibrational coupling doesn't exist when constructing partition functions)

But yeah, it's mostly just sticks.
 
@chemisttree: I'd be satisfied with 2D, and wouldn't complain about a little axial friction.

@alxm: Ok, but it's still interesting even as a classical system. It isn't obvious for everyone to visualize just how the spring constant affects rotation. Or how rotation speed affects vibration amplitude.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top