Rotor rooter and artifical gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter mitch bass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Rotor
AI Thread Summary
Centrifugal force is responsible for the sensations experienced on the Rotor Rooter ride and the artificial gravity in rotating space stations. When the Rotor Rooter ride begins, if a person is not pressed against the wall, they would be snapped back due to the centrifugal force transmitted through contact with the floor. In a space station, the rotation creates artificial gravity, affecting objects suspended within the structure only if air is present to transmit the force. When an object is released in a rotating environment, it follows a straight-line path until it contacts the wall, where it resumes circular motion, illustrating the principles of centripetal and centrifugal forces. Overall, both scenarios demonstrate how rotational motion influences perceived gravity and object behavior.
mitch bass
[SOLVED] rotor rooter and artifical gravity

There is a ride in the carnival called the Rotor Rooter in which people stand up with their backs against a curved wall. This wall starts to move swiftly, spinning in a circular motion and then the floor drops out and a person finds themselves not falling but rather attached to the wall behind them. The sensation of being on the ride is as if lying down.

Then there is the so-called artificial gravity that is generated on space stations which, if I am not mistaken is a product of the rotation of the station.

Is centrifugal force responsible for both the Rotor Rooter and the Space Stations artificial gravity? If a person began the Rotor Rooter ride without having their backs against the wall would they be snapped back once the ride began? Can someone please explain to the governing dynamics behind how centrifugal force operates in both these circumstances? In a space station does the gravity that is created through the rotation effect things that are suspended between the walls of the structure. If so how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by mitch bass
Is centrifugal force responsible for both the Rotor Rooter and the Space Stations artificial gravity?
Yes.
If a person began the Rotor Rooter ride without having their backs against the wall would they be snapped back once the ride began?
Yes. They have contact to the floor, which transmits the centrifugal force.
In a space station does the gravity that is created through the rotation effect things that are suspended between the walls of the structure. If so how?
In vacuum, no. But if you have air in the station, it will take up the rotational motion, and so transmit the centrifugal force.
 
In a space station does the gravity that is created through the rotation effect things that are suspended between the walls of the structure.

How are they suspended? If for example, you "hang a light bulb from the ceiling", it would appear to be pulled "down" (down being away from the center of rotation, of course).

On the other hand, if you held a ball up and then released it, the instant you release it, the momentum it already has (moving circularly with your hand) causes it to move along the line of it's momentum vector: until it comes into contact with the wall and then resumes it circular motion. On a small "space station" that might be indistinguishable from the straight line a falling object would take. On a large space station, that path would appear to be a curve and would be attributed to "coriolis force".

What's really happening, of course, is that a object in motion tends to move in a straight line. In order to force it to move in a circle you have to apply a force in toward the center of the circle (the centripetal force). The "equal and opposite" force we feel apply the central force is what we call centrifugal force.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top