MHB What is the nearest 10 mph to 684,288,000 pi miles per hour?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around rounding the value of 684,288,000 pi miles per hour to the nearest 10 miles per hour. The approximate value of 684,288,000 pi is calculated as 2,149,754,153.73965243556. To round this number to the nearest 10, the result is 2,149,754,150. The conversation clarifies the mathematical significance of pi as an irrational and transcendental number. Overall, the rounding process is confirmed to be straightforward and accurate.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
I KNOW HOW TO ROUND. I just want to make that clear but the way this question is worded makes no sense to me.

How do I round 684,288,000 pi miles per hour to the nearest 10 miles per hour?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$$684288000\pi\approx2149754153.73965243556$$
 
pi is the standard transliteration of the Greek Letter, "\pi". In mathematics it is used to represent the constant ratio of the circumference to the diameter of a circle. It is an irrational number (in fact, a transcendental number) that can be approximated by 3.1415926535897932384626433832795 (that is what the calculator that comes with Windows shows) but continues infinitely.

Using that approximation (actually I hit the [math]\pi[/math] key on the calculator) [math]\pi[/math] times 684,288,000 is 2149754153.7396524355611253154576. That's probably what MarkFl did. You should be able to round that to the nearest 10.
 
Excellent. Thanks.

- - - Updated - - -

Note:

2149754153 rounded to the nearest 10 is 2,149,754,150.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top