I Rounding decimals to ruler scale (log, pow math?)

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter 1plus1is10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log Scale
1plus1is10
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I have data (all less than 1) and I need to round down to the nearest 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, and 1/32.
I have no idea how to do this mathematically, but I'm guessing I use log or pow functions.

For example:
0.81 = 0.5 or 1/2
0.33 = 0.25 or 1/4
0.18 = 0.125 or 1/8

Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1plus1is10 said:
I have data (all less than 1) and I need to round down to the nearest 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, and 1/32.
I have no idea how to do this mathematically, but I'm guessing I use log or pow functions.

For example:
0.81 = 0.5 or 1/2
0.33 = 0.25 or 1/4
0.18 = 0.125 or 1/8

Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Are you looking for the mathematical functions and symbols to use, or for an algorithmic solution?
 
1plus1is10 said:
I have data (all less than 1) and I need to round down to the nearest 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, and 1/32.
What does this mean?
You can round down to the nearest 1/2 OR to the nearest 1/4 etc. You can't round to the nearest 1/16 AND 1/32, for example.
 
Sorry for not knowing how to phrase my question.
In the end, I figured it out myself after discovering that pow(0.5, x); gives fractions of the power of 2.

As for my data:
On a calculator, round up the result of: ln(x)/ln(0.5)
And then do a (0.5^y) exponent: 0.5^rounded_UP_result

In code, it is:
pow(0.5, ceil(log(x)/log(0.5)));

Thanks anyway.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top