Running Coupling for Weak Interaction

nigelscott
Messages
133
Reaction score
4
How can I derive the running coupling for the weak interaction. I have found derivations for QED and QCD that involve the β function http://www.physics.umd.edu/courses/Phys741/xji/chapter1.pdf but I can't find anything specific for the WI. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nigelscott said:
How can I derive the running coupling for the weak interaction. I have found derivations for QED and QCD that involve the β function http://www.physics.umd.edu/courses/Phys741/xji/chapter1.pdf but I can't find anything specific for the WI. Thanks.
You would not really compute this for the weak interaction on its own. The weak interactions with Ws and Zs are residuals from the breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry U(1)xSU(2). Above the scale of electroweak symmetry breaking, the running of the hypercharge U(1) and the SU(2)_L are separate and you can compute the beta functions of these based on the number of fermions and scalars transforming under different representations of the gauge symmetries. This should be described in any intermediate text on quantum field theory such as Peskin-Schröder.
 
Thank you for your response. Yes that makes sense. The thing that confused was the single value quoted in http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/forces/couple.html#c4. I assume this must refer to some experimentally determined value. I found this post https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/running-coupling-of-the-weak-interactions.457359/ which says exactly what you said. I am still a little confused what nf and ns would be for both SU(2) and SU(3) for that matter.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top