Running out of hair to yank out (tension)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving towing a sedan up an incline with a frictionless axle. The main challenge is determining the force required to pull the car at a constant speed and the tension in the chain. Participants express frustration over the complexity of the problem, particularly regarding the role of the axle and the connection of the chain. There is a consensus that the frictionless nature of the axle simplifies the situation, suggesting that the forces involved should be equal to the force parallel to the incline needed to keep the car stationary. Overall, the problem is seen as potentially misleading due to the excess information provided.
Tycho
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I've been stuck on this problem all weekend. yes, all weekend. no partying, no hanging, no general fun of any kind. What's so frustrating about this is that i just can't seem to get it started.

A sedan rolled off the road and needs to be towed. In order to get the car on the tow bed, it is pulled along an incline of 23.1 degrees with a chain wrapped around a frictionless axle, composed of a solid cylinder of mass 58.2kg and a diameter .211m. The car has a mass of 1120kg.

a) find the force required to pull on the chain in order that the car moves at a constant speed

b) find the tension in the chain.

At this point, I would generally say what I know, but after staring at this all weekend, all I KNOW is that I'm running out of hair to yank out! Someone please have mercy on my poor, tortured soul!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Now take this with a grain of salt, since axles and pulleys have never been my forte, but I think it depends on where the other end of the chain is connected. If it's connected to some tow truck, it shouldn't mater, both of the forces should be the same and equal to the force parallel to the incline necessary to keep the car stationary (you can calculate that as usual from the force of gravity + normal force etc). I think there'd only be a difference if the car was "towing itself" by means of some axle (ie, if the chain looped back). So I pretty much think this is a scare problem that over-provides you with information (the axle can be ignored since it is frictionless).

But I'm not quite 100% sure; as I said, my axle/pulley understanding is not as great as it could be.
 
Duarh said:
Now take this with a grain of salt, since axles and pulleys have never been my forte, but I think it depends on where the other end of the chain is connected. If it's connected to some tow truck, it shouldn't mater, both of the forces should be the same and equal to the force parallel to the incline necessary to keep the car stationary (you can calculate that as usual from the force of gravity + normal force etc). I think there'd only be a difference if the car was "towing itself" by means of some axle (ie, if the chain looped back). So I pretty much think this is a scare problem that over-provides you with information (the axle can be ignored since it is frictionless).

But I'm not quite 100% sure; as I said, my axle/pulley understanding is not as great as it could be.

This is what i thought at first, but it is scaring me a little more then usual, especially since we JUST covered this in class. I'm with you, though. i don't see how the stupid cylinder would make a difference, lol. it just seems like the only purpose it would serve would be to avoid making an angle that the chain pulls on the car.

does anyone else have a say on this?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top