Rydberg Equation: Physics and Beyond

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Iceking20
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the applicability of the Rydberg equation in modern physics, particularly in relation to its use for the hydrogen atom and its acceptance compared to the Bohr model. Participants explore the contexts in which the Rydberg formula is valid and inquire about methods for calculating orbital energy levels.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the Rydberg equation is still accepted in contemporary physics or if it has been denied like the Bohr model.
  • Participants reference a Wikipedia article that discusses the conditions under which the Rydberg formula yields correct results.
  • There is a query about the method for calculating orbital energy levels, particularly in cases where the Rydberg formula may not apply.
  • One participant suggests that the topic of calculating orbital energy levels is complex and may not be suitable for a forum discussion, recommending consultation of a textbook on quantum mechanics instead.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the current acceptance of the Rydberg equation and its limitations, indicating that multiple views remain on its applicability and the methods for calculating orbital energy levels.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the Rydberg equation's applicability and the complexities involved in calculating orbital energy levels, which may depend on specific conditions and definitions.

Iceking20
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Is Reydberg equation still valid and use?
I saw that rydberg equation used for hydrogen atom,so does it still acceptable for world of physics or it just dinied like bohr model?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Iceking20 said:
I saw that rydberg equation used for hydrogen atom

Where did you see this?
 
Iceking20 said:
does it still acceptable for world of physics

The Wikipedia article you linked to explains in which cases the formula gives correct results and in which cases it does not.
 
PeterDonis said:
The Wikipedia article you linked to explains in which cases the formula gives correct results and in which cases it does not.
So what is the way to calculating orbital energy level?
 
Iceking20 said:
So what is the way to calculating orbital energy level?

Do you mean for cases where the Rydberg formula does not give correct results? That is a much more complicated subject which cannot be dealt with adequately in a PF discussion thread. You should consult a textbook on QM.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K