MHB Solve $\sin(\alpha + \beta)$: Answer #41

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation for $\sin(\alpha + \beta)$ using the sine addition formula, leading to the conclusion that $f(\alpha + \beta) = \frac{1 - 2\sqrt{6}}{6}$. The values of $\sin(\alpha)$ and $\cos(\beta)$ are derived from given graphs, resulting in $\sin(\alpha) = \frac{1}{2}$ and $\sin(\beta) = -\frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3}$. Additionally, a separate problem involving $\sin(2\theta) = \frac{1}{3}$ is introduced, with solutions in quadrants I and II, emphasizing the periodic nature of the sine function. The discussion concludes with a clarification on the use of $\arccos\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)$ to find the complementary angle to $\alpha$.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
View attachment 7029

trying to do #41

\begin{align*}\displaystyle
\sin(\alpha + \beta)
&=\sin\alpha \cos \beta
+\cos \alpha \sin \beta\\
&=
\frac{1}{4}\cdot\frac{3}{1}
+\frac{\sqrt{15}}{4}\cdot \frac{\sqrt{10}}{3}
\end{align*}

ok the book answer to this was

$$f(\alpha + \beta)=\frac{1-2\sqrt{6}}{6}$$

but I couldn't derive this
 

Attachments

  • 8.3.41.PNG
    8.3.41.PNG
    6.3 KB · Views: 122
Mathematics news on Phys.org
From the graph on the left, we have:

$$2\sin(\alpha)=1\implies \sin(\alpha)=\frac{1}{2}$$-

Hence:

$$\cos(\alpha)=\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^2}=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$$

And from the graph on the right:

$$\cos(\beta)=\frac{1}{3}$$

Hence (observing the terminal side of the angle is in the 4th quadrant):

$$\sin(\beta)=-\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^2}=-\frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3}$$

And so we find:

$$f(\alpha+\beta)=\sin(\alpha+\beta)=\sin(\alpha)\cos(\beta)+\cos(\alpha)\sin(\beta)=\frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{1}{3}-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\cdot\frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3}=\frac{1-2\sqrt{6}}{6}$$
 
ok I had r=4 not r=2

(Headbang)ok if I can sneak another one in here

$$\displaystyle\sin\left({2\theta}\right)= \frac{1}{3}$$
$$3\sin\left({2\theta}\right) = 1$$

then ?
 
karush said:
ok I had r=4 not r=2

(Headbang)ok if I can sneak another one in here

$$\displaystyle\sin\left({2\theta}\right)= \frac{1}{3}$$
$$3\sin\left({2\theta}\right) = 1$$

then ?

I'm assuming you are to solve for $\theta$...in which case I would observe that there are solutions in quadrant I and quadrant II, and they are symmetrical about $$\alpha=\frac{\pi}{2}$$, and we must keep the periodicity of the sine function in mind, hence:

$$2\theta=\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\pm\arccos\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)\right)+2k\pi$$ where $k\in\mathbb{Z}$

And so we have:

$$\theta=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\pm\arccos\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)\right)+k\pi=\frac{\pi}{4}(4k+1)\pm\frac{1}{2}\arccos\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)$$
 
why $\arccos\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)$ ?
 
karush said:
why $\arccos\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)$ ?

If we have:

$$\sin(\alpha)=\frac{1}{3}$$

But, we want the angle between the terminal side of $\alpha$ and $$\frac{\pi}{2}$$...that is we want the complementary angle to $\alpha$. :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top