Safe distance from a neutron star

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of a "goldilocks zone" around neutron stars, which refers to the distance where conditions might allow for liquid water. The closest neutron star, PSR_J0108-1431, has a calculated circumstellar habitable zone of approximately 0.039 astronomical units, similar to Earth's distance from the Sun. However, the environment around neutron stars is extremely hostile due to high-energy radiation, primarily X-rays, which would strip away planetary atmospheres. Only super-Earths might retain sufficient atmospheres to support life, and the violent history of neutron stars, often linked to supernova events, complicates the potential for life. Overall, neutron stars present significant challenges for habitability due to their intense radiation and destructive origins.
Blue Shift 2112
what is the goldilocks range from a neutron star?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I don't think life would be easy if the local source of energy is X-rays.
 
Blue Shift 2112 said:
what is the goldilocks range from a neutron star?
The title question is not the same as the question you posted.

The goldilocks zone or "circumstellar habitable zone" is defined by the irradiance that allows liquid surface water on a planet similar to earth. Irradiance is proportional to distance squared.

The closest neutron star PSR_J0108-1431 has a spin down energy release of 5.8 x 1023 W. Which corresponds to 1.5 x 10-3 solar luminosity. You can stick that number into the equation and calculate the CHZ: √(1.5x 10-3) = 0.039 astronomical units is the same range as earth. The CHZ is not an exact distance.

A "safe distance" is quite a different matter. Much of the irradiance comes in the form of x-rays and high energy particles. The surface temperature may be between 0 and 100C but the atmosphere would be ripped away if the planet is similar to earth.

Higher mass planets might hold on to an atmosphere for awhile longer. The bottom of a deep sea trench would not receive high energy radiation. There is discussion about the possibility of life on Europa or Titan.
 
Neutron stars tend to be rather hostile to life. Not just because of their excessive high energy radiation and particle emissions, but, also due to their lineage. It is fairly well established they would wreak havoc upon planetary atmospheres. Only a super Earth would be able to retain enough of an atmosphere to sustain biologic processes. Also consider that the typical neutron star progenitor is a supernova - an event that does not bode well for complex molecules, much less any preexisting life forms. Significant time would be needed for a newborn neutron star to settle down sufficient to permit biogenesis to reboot on any surviving planets..
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top