Safety of a pebble bed reactor.

  • Thread starter Thread starter vanesch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactor Safety
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the safety of pebble bed reactors compared to pressurized water reactors (PWR) and boiling water reactors (BWR). While pebble bed reactors are often touted as "safer," the fundamental differences in safety mechanisms, such as negative temperature coefficients, are questioned. A key point raised is the ability of pebble bed reactors to maintain core integrity during accidents without immediate forced cooling, allowing operators more time to respond. Concerns about extreme scenarios, like aircraft impacts, are addressed, noting that modern reactors are designed with robust containment structures to withstand such events. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of reactor safety and the need for thorough evaluation of different reactor designs.
vanesch
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,109
Reaction score
20
I heard and read several times that a pebble bed reactor is "safer" than a PWR or a BWR. However, I fail to figure out how. After all, light-water reactors also have negative temperature coefficients, which seem to be the "invention" that makes the pebble bed reactor "inherently safe". But I fail to see what's so fundamentally different between this type of reactor, and the old graphite-gas cooled reactors by the UK and the French, except that now, the reactor core is made out of pebbles instead of blocks...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well, I had a nuclear reactor physics prof who specialized in HTGRs and his comment was, there could be an accident, e.g. LOCA, and one could scram the reactor, then go to lunch, order a nice bottle of wine and take one's time to figure out how to resolve the problem because the core wouldn't melt, and it could maintain its integrity even without forced cooling during the decay heat period. I don't imagine the nuclear regulators would take such a relaxed and casual attitude, but there is a certain level of confidence that the core materials can handle high temperatures without loosing integrity and releasing fission products to the environment.
 
Astronuc said:
Well, I had a nuclear reactor physics prof who specialized in HTGRs and his comment was, there could be an accident, e.g. LOCA, and one could scram the reactor, then go to lunch, order a nice bottle of wine...

I always thought this was the russian way to handle a reactor accident (just using vodka instead of wine...)

seriously, what about one other favourite worst-case scenario: suicide-terrorist-flies-747-sized-aircraft-into-reactor ? would it provide a safety advantage in this case too ?
 
Oberst Villa said:
seriously, what about one other favourite worst-case scenario: suicide-terrorist-flies-747-sized-aircraft-into-reactor ? would it provide a safety advantage in this case too ?
Western plants are designed with containment structures surrounding the pressure vessel and major components of the primary circuit. These have been tested against aircraft impact, and the modern plants are designed with that as a consideration.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top