Salt Bridge Questions: Will Zinc Affect Cell Potential?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AnathemaXI
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge Salt
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the role of salt bridges in electrochemical cells, specifically whether changing the salt bridge from potassium nitrate to zinc nitrate affects cell potential. It is established that while the salt bridge facilitates ion flow and charge neutralization, its material does not impact open circuit voltage under equilibrium conditions. However, if the cell is not at equilibrium and current is being drawn, the ionic conductivity of the salt bridge becomes significant. A higher ionic conductivity results in a higher cell potential, while a lower conductivity leads to losses and a reduced potential. The example provided involves a Fe|Fe2+ || Ni2+|Ni cell with specific molarities, where the cell potential was calculated using the Nernst equation. The discussion concludes that as long as no current flows and the salt bridge ions do not mix with the electrode solutions, the cell potential remains unchanged despite the salt bridge material.
AnathemaXI
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I've just about had it with these salt bridges. It's such an easy concept but there are too many questions about it.

I understand that the salt bridge enables the flow of ions for the cathodes and anodes by neutralizing charges, but if you use a different salt bridge (Say zinc nitrate instead of potassium nitrate) would it effect the actual cell potential at all? Although zinc has a lower reducing strength and higher oxidizing strength than potassium, it's still going to neutralize the charges in the solution.

Can anyone explain to me if it would or wouldn't effect the cell potential?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The answer is, it depends. If you are talking about open circuit voltage, then no, theoretically the salt bridge material will not affect the cell potential. However, if the cell is not at equilibrium, that is there is some kind of net transfer of charge, then yes it will. This change in potential is due to the ionic conductivity of the bridge which generates losses in the cell that manifest as a lower cell potential. A bridge with a higher ionic conductivity will yield a higher cell potential when current is being drawn and vice-versa.
 
In the example I'm thinking about it refers to an electrochemical cell, a closed one at that. The molarities of the of the solutions are not at standard conditions so it is not at equilibrium. I'll give you the whole picture b/c maybe that would help more.

I was given the problem that a student is making a Fe|Fe2+ || Ni2+|Ni cell. He had .25M Nickel nitrate solution and .75 Iron II chloride solution. I discovered the cell potential under those conditions would be .18 V using the Nernst equation.

Now the question I'm trying to solve after that is if replacing the original potassium nitrate solution with a zinc nitrate solution would effect the cell potential. I see that zinc is still capable of reducing Fe and Ni albeit not as much as K. It is also a strong electrolyte so it would dissociate completely and neutralize the cathode and anode.

I'm not sure exactly how to judge the ionic conductivity of the salt bridge in relation to what you said. Zinc 2+ isn't as strong of a reducing agent as potassium, so does that mean it yields a lower ionic conductivity as a salt bridge which would lead to a decrease in cell potential?
 
Last edited:
You mean zinc nitrate replaces potassium nitrate in salt bridge?

As Topher wrote, as long as there is no current flowing through the circuit and ions in the salt bridge don't mix with the electrode solutions, potential of the cell shouldn't change.

--
methods
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top