Same expressions, but different functions

hellbike
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
f(x) = x/x

g(x) = 1

so... those are different functions? i don't know how to treat expressions like that.


When expression is not defined for some x=a, but after some algebraic transformations i get expresion defined for x=a ... what happends?

Can i make algebraic transformations on expressions with an unknown number without knowing it's value?
I know can.
But can i do this with epression that is part of a function?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You talk about "functions", but then it becomes very relevant to mention the domain. Assuming you mean the "maximal domain", i.e. all real numbers for which the expression is meaningful, then both functions are indeed different. The first expression is not defined for x = 0, since division by zero is undefined. The second expression of course also exists for x = 0; so yes: they are different.
The graph of f would be exactly the same as the graph of g, except for a "small hole" (or "perforation") at (0,1). The algebraic manipulation you would perform to go from x/x to 1, is only allowed for x nonzero so if you start with x/x, you can only simplify it to "1" if you keep track of the condition that this only holds for all nonzero x.
 
And even if you wrote f(x) = g(x) = x, they might still have different codomains and so be different functions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top