Samsung tablet not 'cool' says UK judge

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2AlphaMales?!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cool Judge Uk
AI Thread Summary
Samsung won a UK High Court case against Apple, which claimed that the Galaxy Tab 10 infringed on the iPad's design. Judge Colin Birss ruled that Apple's designs were not infringed upon, stating that the Galaxy Tab was not as "cool" as the iPad, leading to minimal confusion between the two devices. The ruling emphasizes that superficial similarities do not constitute a violation of design rights. The discussion also touches on opinions about the value and appeal of Samsung products compared to Apple's offerings. Overall, the court's decision highlights the subjective nature of design aesthetics in technology.
2AlphaMales?!
Samsung has won a UK High Court case against Apple over the design of the firms' respective tablet computers.

Apple brought the case alleging that Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10 infringed the design of its iPad.

Judge Colin Birss disagreed saying Apple's designs were not being infringed because Samsung's Galaxy Tab was not as "cool" as the iPad.

As a result, he said, few would confuse the two even though they appeared superficially similar.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18773690


So apparently Samsung hasn't violated Apple's iPad patents. I beg to differ with the judge's ruling however in that the Samsung is much better value (cooler) than the iPad...as with all Apple products IIRC. If, however, "coolness" is often equated with "stupidity", then I could be mistaken. Maybe not the right forum but it is about the design of the product so...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You would honestly take a Windows-burner over a Mac?! Fie on thee! Those things are as useless at teats on a nun.
 
I'm off to help my new portuguese housemate buy a lappy from ARGOS tomoz. Looking at around £200. It ain't a i(mage)Mac(tm).
 
His loss.
 
Not financially. Or in terms of availabal software, or compatibility with the majority of data processing technology, for that matter.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top