Satellite Problem: 2 Difficulties of Effective Communic.

  • Thread starter Thread starter ultimateroxas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellite
AI Thread Summary
Effective communication between satellites and Earth faces significant challenges, including distance and atmospheric interference. The vast distances involved can weaken signals, making reliable communication difficult. Additionally, atmospheric and magnetospheric conditions can disrupt radio signals, leading to potential data loss. Satellite alignment with the Sun can also cause interference, as antennas may inadvertently point toward the Sun instead of the satellite. These factors contribute to the complexities of maintaining consistent satellite communications.
ultimateroxas
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Describe TWO difficulties associated with effective or reliable communications between satellites and Earth.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



my class work
Many google searches but still no clear answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ultimateroxas said:

Homework Statement



Describe TWO difficulties associated with effective or reliable communications between satellites and Earth.

Ask yourself the following questions. By what means do we communicate with satellites orbiting the Earth? What is essential in order to maintain communication by those means? Now, given where satellites are and what they do, what problems could interfere with such communications?
 
Thanks for your help. i ended up using Distance and The Van Allen Radiation Belts as my two answers and got some info about them. thanks again.
 
ultimateroxas said:
Thanks for your help. i ended up using Distance and The Van Allen Radiation Belts as my two answers and got some info about them. thanks again.

OK. I was thinking about atmospheric (and magnetospheric) interference with radio communications, the occasional alignment of some satellites with the Sun (so that an antenna on Earth pointing at the satellite is aimed right at the strongest radio source in the Solar System), and the fact that most kinds of satellites are not in view from a fixed point on Earth for long periods (geostationary communications satellites are the exception -- the orbits are chosen to assure that they are always in view from a given location).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top