Tank Half Full Time: Solving the Doubling Water Tank Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bradyns
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The water in a tank doubles every minute, reaching full capacity at the 60-minute mark. The correct reasoning indicates that the tank is half full one minute before it is full, which means it is half full at the 59-minute mark. The initial argument presented used an incorrect equation setup, leading to confusion about the timing. The proper equation demonstrates that at 59 minutes, the volume is indeed half of the full capacity. Therefore, the consensus confirms that the tank is half full at 59 minutes.
Bradyns
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
The amount of water in a tank doubles every minute. If the tank was full at the 1 hour mark, when was the tank half full?
=============================
It's not homework, I'm just trying to get the actual (reasoned) answer..
=============================
Here is the answer I argued (though, I'm not sure):
2^x = [(2^59)/2]
2^x = 2^58
x = 58
=============================
But, almost everyone argues:
If it doubles every minute, isn't it half full the minute before it's full? ie. 59
=============================

Pretty sure I'm incorrect, I just want to know for sure..
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The argument of everyone (not yours) is correct.
Your working is correct as well, its just that your first equation is wrong.
 
Last edited:
V = k*2x, where x is in minutes and k is some unknown constant (the volume of the tank at the start of the timer x=0).

At x=60 the tank is full, therefore, if we denote the full volume of the tank as Vf then Vf=k*260. Now, We want to know when the tank is half full, which is Vf/2

Clearly, Vf/2 = k*260/2 = k*259

If we compare this to the original equation, x=59 minutes as you would expect.

I know this explanation is long-winded, but I hope it got the point across as to how you should have set up the equation.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top