Scalar Field Theory-Vacuum Expectation Value

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the vacuum expectation value of a squared average field operator for a quantized, neutral scalar field. Participants emphasize the importance of switching to spherical coordinates and correctly setting up the integral measures. There is a debate about the proper form of the integral and the necessity of separating spatial and time components. Suggestions include integrating over angles and transforming the integrand to facilitate evaluation using gamma functions. The conversation highlights the complexity of the integral and the need for careful manipulation to arrive at a solution.
Mick83
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am given an equation for a quantized, neutral scalar field expanded in creation and destruction operators, and need to find the vacuum expectation value of a defined average field operator, squared. See attached pdf.


Homework Equations


Everything is attached, but I can include more.


The Attempt at a Solution


I've solved part (a) (I think- if someone could check my work it would be appreciated), so I need some idea on how to do part (b). The question clearly asks for the expectation of the squared value, but I don't have a clue how to solve the integral in the first place, which must then be squared to find the expectation value.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
switch to spherical coordinates... put your z axis toward the direction of k i.e. measure your \theta angle from k. don't forget to use the correct integral measure...
 
So use k_{\mu}=\bigg(\mathbf{k},\frac{i\omega}{c}\bigg),~~ x_{\mu}=(\mathbf{x},ict),~~ <br /> \mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{x}=k_{\mu}x_{\mu}-\omega t=k_1x_1+k_2x_2+k_3x_3-\omega t<br /> =kr(\sin\theta \cos\phi +\sin\theta \sin\phi +\cos\theta)-\omega t? Regardless of the θ or ∅ dependence, \int^{\infty}_0 dr~r^2~ e^{r^2/2b}~e^{ikr} gives a horrible result, even when squared.
 
nono that is not correct.
The kx in the power of the exponential is already only the 3-part of them. the expression is not in a "covariant" form, but the usual separate spatial and time parts.

So If you put your z axis towards the direction of k, and measure the angle \theta from there your integral will be:

\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi\int_0^{\infty}dr \, r^2 e^{-r^2/2b^2} \int_{-1}^{1}d\cos{\theta} e^{ikr\cos\theta}The theta part can be integrated easily.

U will get the kind of integral wt you wrote:

\int_0^{\infty}dr\, r^2 e^{-r^2/2b^2}e^{\pm ikr}

now try bringing the integrand into the form:r^2e^{-ax^2} i.e. complete the square on the exponentials. this kind of integral can be simply expressed with gamma functions.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top