Scalars and determining subspaces

  • Thread starter Thread starter MoreDrinks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scalars Subspaces
MoreDrinks
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
To determine if a subset of a vector space is a subspace, it must be closed under addition and scalar multiplication. As far as I can tell, this means adding two arbitrary vectors in the subset and having the sum be within the subset.

But...can the scalar be any number? Is there any limitation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If ##W## is a subspace of ##V##, then ##\alpha v\in W## for any scalar ##\alpha## and for any ##w\in W##.
 
micromass said:
If ##W## is a subspace of ##V##, then ##\alpha v\in W## for any scalar ##\alpha## and for any ##w\in W##.

Thanks, my book is terrible.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top