Scaling The Solar System By A Factor ##\alpha##

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a homework problem involving scaling a model of the solar system by a factor α, specifically examining how velocity and period change with this scaling. The user initially derives that velocity scales as v ∝ α, but struggles with the period T, questioning why r is not also scaled in the same manner for part ii. After some back-and-forth, it is clarified that while velocity scales with α, the period T actually scales inversely with α, resulting in T ∝ 1/α. The user ultimately resolves their confusion and thanks others for their assistance.
XanMan
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
I am given the solution to the first part of the problem, however not the second part - would appreciate for someone to double check my work! Cheers.

1. Homework Statement

If a scale model of the solar system is made using materials of the same respective average density as the sun and planets, but reducing all linear dimension by a factor ##\alpha##, how will the velocity and period scale with ##\alpha##? Assume a circular orbit in your calculations.

Homework Equations


[/B]
$$F = \cfrac{GMm}{r^2}
$$F = \cfrac{mv^2}{r}

The Attempt at a Solution



Starting off with the basic relationship required:
$$\cfrac{GMm}{r^2} = \cfrac{mv^2}{r}$$

Then: ##v^2 = \cfrac{GM}{r} \propto \cfrac{G \rho R^3}{r}##, where ##R## is the radius of the Sun.

In general: $$v^2 \propto \cfrac{R^3}{r}$$

Re-scaling the solar system by ##\alpha##:

$$v^2 \propto \cfrac{\alpha^3 R^3}{\alpha r}$$

i) Therefore ##v \propto \alpha##

Now, ##v = \cfrac{2 \pi r}{T}##. Thus:
$$\cfrac{2 \pi r}{T} \propto \alpha$$

ii) Therefore ##T \propto \cfrac{1}{\alpha}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, apparently ##v\propto\alpha## is the right answer. If that is so, then I don't understand why you don't let ##r\propto\alpha## in part ii).

Oh, and a belated :welcome: !
 
  • Like
Likes XanMan
BvU said:
Well, apparently ##v\propto\alpha## is the right answer. If that is so, then I don't understand why you don't let ##r\propto\alpha## in part ii).

Oh, and a belated :welcome: !

Thank you! I'm not quite sure what you mean exactly. With some reasoning I could have also said that since ##v \propto \alpha##, then ##r \propto \alpha##. It thus follows that ##T \propto \cfrac{1}{\alpha}##.
 
What I mean is

In part 1 you use ##r' = \alpha r## to find ##v'= \alpha v##
Why don't you do that in part ii) ? to find that ##T'= {2\pi r'\over v'} = ..##
 
  • Like
Likes XanMan
BvU said:
What I mean is

In part 1 you use ##r' = \alpha r## to find ##v'= \alpha v##
Why don't you do that in part ii) ? to find that ##T'= {2\pi r'\over v'} = ..##

In which case ##T' = T## - thus ##T## is independent of ##\alpha##? What is wrong in my reasoning that results in me obtaining ##T \propto \cfrac{1}{\alpha}##?
 
You left ##r## as is. In part i) you inserted ##\alpha r##:
XanMan said:
Re-scaling the solar system by α:$$v^2 \propto \cfrac{\alpha^3 R^3}{\alpha r}$$

[edit] By the way: I had seen this part ii) result before, here
 
  • Like
Likes XanMan
Ah, how silly of me! Looked at the result you forwarded as well - got it now. Thank you so much and all the best for the new year!
 
Back
Top