What Are the Exact Scherrer Shape Factors for Different Crystallite Structures?

Salish99
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
The Scherrer equation is used to determine crystallite sizes from XRD spectra.
they contain K, a shape factor, that varies from 0.89 for spherical to 0.94 for cubic particles. Usually, this is set to 0.9 for particles of unknown size.
Does anyone know where we could find a table with the exact, published values for different crystallites (e.g. monoclinic, cubic, etc.)?

Scherrer's original papers are published here
http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/dm...]=scherrer&tx_goobit3_search[squery]=scherrer
but a) in German, and b) do not contain such a table.

thanks.

The discussions in
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=122682&page=2
and
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=322033
simply assume it's 0.9. No reference is given there. I need the exact table, and a reference.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are mixing the crystallite shape with the unit cell of the crystal.
As you say yourself, K depends on the shape of the crystallite and not that of the unit cell.
There may be a realtion between unit cell and crystallite shape (NaCl has cubic unit cell and may crystalize in cubic crystallites) but is not unique and not well determined.

If you take cubic crystallites and grind them in a mill you may end up with spherical particles or irregularly shaped particles, depending on the milling conditions.
There are also crystals with cubic unit cell (ferrites for example) that may crystallize in elongated (needle-like) crystals.
 
Attached a table from the International Union of Crystallography, Vol 3 Section 5.2, 1986 pp.318-323. It shows some shape factors to be used for the cubic system, depending on the reflection plane, and the shape (octahedron, cube, tetrahedron) of the actual crystal.
Interesting to see is that only one value is below 1, whereas is all this forum, as well as in many published papers, 0.9 is usually used "when the shape is unknown".
I would like to have someone tell me where that information comes from, with reference please.
thanks!

(and, no, outdated student pages like http://www.d.umn.edu/~bhar0022/dpcalculator/index.php and http://www.eng.uc.edu/~gbeaucag/Classes/XRD/SathishScherrerhtml/SathishScherrerEqn.html do not have any references either - maybe people don't think about that factor usually)
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
I have value of 2 theta 35.546 deg, d spacing 2.5235 A, fwhm (2 th) 0.148 deg, can somone use it to get size of crystallite. after getting data analysed by a program expertplus i have got this, thankyou
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
12K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top