I Schroedinger Equation from Variational Principle

Sturk200
Messages
168
Reaction score
17
Landau's nonrelativistic quantum mechanics has a "derivation" of Schroedinger's equation using what he calls "the variational principle". Apparently such a principle implies that:

$$\delta \int \psi^{\ast} (\hat{H} - E) \psi dq = 0$$

From here I can see that varying ##\psi## and ##\psi^{\ast}## independently gives rise to the equation ##\hat{H} \psi = E \psi##. But where does that first equation come from? I think it is saying that the the allowed energies are those for which the difference between the expectation value of the hamiltonian and the energy is minimized. I'm not sure why that should be so. Is there some analogue to classical mechanics that I'm missing?

(Note: this is section 20 of the book).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have a classically motivated differential equation of motion for some degree(s) of freedom, you can usually hack your way towards a Lagrangian that yields that equation. A reasonable starting point is to multiply the equation on the left by your DOF (here, \psi) and start integrating by parts.

In classical mechanics this would usually be pretty pointless. In quantum theory this action can be used to construct a path integral, providing a different way of computing observables.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top