Schwarzchild solution with cosmological constant

Terilien
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
How do we solve for it? I still don't know much about non linear equations. Unfortunately, this reduces to R=-4(cosmos constant) which is not a system thus making simplicfication difficult. I'm assuming that we can still use the previous arguments and assume that the metric coompontents Gtt and Grr are exponential functions but beyond that I'm not sure what to do...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You might look at the Schwarzschild - de Sitter solution, for instance http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0602002. This eprint doesn't go into the "how" of the solution very much (in fact it's concerned about modelling aspects of bound systems in such a geometry). If you really want "how" and not just a solution, I'd try Wald. I believe his approach to finding the Schwarzschild solution could be easily generalized to finding the Schwarzschild solution with a cosmological constant.
 
Deriving the Schwarzschild-de Sitter lambdavacuum

pervect said:
I believe his approach to finding the Schwarzschild solution could be easily generalized to finding the Schwarzschild solution with a cosmological constant.

Yeah, it's trivial. You know that in any lambda vacuum solution, the Einstein tensor (evaluated wrt some frame field) has to have the form k \, \operatorname{diag}(-1,1,1,1) where k is some undetermined constant. So start with a Schwarzschild coordinate chart (having two undetermined functions) and plug in this condition. The EFE then reduces to a simple ODE similar to the one you obtain in solving for the Schwarzschild vacuum; indeed the case k=0 recovers the Schwarzschild vacuum. This determines both metric functions up to constant multiples which can be "gauged away". Now you can relate the parameter k to either the "cosmological horizon radius" or equivalently to the "cosmological constant". The resulting solution is properly called the "Schwarzschild-de Sitter lambdavacuum". Historically-minded writers sometimes call it "Kottler solution".
 
Question, will i need some knowledge of non linear equations, to generalize it?
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top