Sci/Tech Headlines: New Breakthroughs & Fads

  • Thread starter Pattonias
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses frustration with the constant coverage of cell phones and tablets in the Sci/Tech headlines and a desire for more diverse and interesting topics. The speaker also mentions their preferred source of news being physorg.com, which focuses on more niche and complex scientific breakthroughs.
  • #1
Pattonias
197
0
I'm tired of the Sci/Tech headlines always being about cell phones and tablets. Let's have a new breakthrough or fad so I can take interest in that section of the news again. Surely something is actually happening in technology or science other than Verizon getting the Iphone... I go to further lament
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Where do you get your news? I go straight to physorg.com (via a blackberry app actually) and thus bypass the mainstream media, which is always going to be about stuff the majority of people are interested about and can understand. The major breakthroughs in science are not going to make the major news unless people think it's going to effect them in some direct and comprehensible way.

-DaveKA
 

1. What is the difference between a breakthrough and a fad in science and technology?

A breakthrough in science and technology refers to a significant advancement or discovery that has the potential to revolutionize a certain field or industry. On the other hand, a fad is a short-lived trend or craze that gains popularity quickly but fades away just as fast. While a breakthrough has lasting impact and contributes to the progression of science and technology, a fad is often a passing trend with little long-term impact.

2. How are new breakthroughs and fads in science and technology discovered or identified?

New breakthroughs in science and technology are often the result of extensive research and experimentation by scientists and researchers. These breakthroughs are usually published in scientific journals and presented at conferences to share their findings with the wider scientific community. Fads, on the other hand, are often identified through media coverage and social media buzz, and may not necessarily be based on scientific evidence or research.

3. What role do the media and social media play in shaping public perception of science and technology?

The media, including social media, can have a significant impact on the public's perception of science and technology. They have the power to shape public opinion, highlight new breakthroughs, and create hype around certain fads. However, it is important to be critical and evaluate the information presented by the media, as it may not always be accurate or based on scientific evidence.

4. How can we distinguish between legitimate breakthroughs and fads in science and technology?

It is important to do thorough research and consider the source of information when trying to distinguish between legitimate breakthroughs and fads in science and technology. Look for peer-reviewed articles and reputable sources to ensure the information is based on scientific evidence. Additionally, consider the longevity of the trend - a breakthrough will have lasting impact, while a fad will typically die out quickly.

5. What impact do new breakthroughs and fads have on society?

New breakthroughs in science and technology can have a profound impact on society, leading to advancements in various industries, improved quality of life, and new opportunities for innovation. Fads, on the other hand, may have a temporary impact on society, but they do not typically contribute to long-term progress or development. It is important for society to critically evaluate and embrace legitimate breakthroughs while being wary of fads that may not have lasting impact.

Similar threads

  • Computing and Technology
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
Back
Top