Scientists' EQ: Analyzing Situations & Necessary EQ Levels

  • Thread starter Thread starter asdf1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Levels Scientist
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between scientists' analytical skills and their emotional intelligence (EQ). It suggests that while scientists excel in objective analysis, their emotional quotient may not be as developed due to the nature of scientific work, which prioritizes logic and rationality over emotional considerations. The conversation highlights that science is less subjective than fields like the humanities, allowing scientists to operate effectively even with minimal emotional engagement. Additionally, it humorously notes that an overly logical approach could hinder personal relationships, implying that a balance between emotion and logic is essential in life beyond scientific endeavors.
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
if scientists are good at analyzing situtations, why aren't their EQ neccesary all that great?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EQ?

IQ?

If you mean IQ, then it's because IQ is worthless and the tests are flawed.

PL
 
The reference to EQ is probably referring to an "Emotional Quotient."

Science isn't really a subjective field like the humanities, so it doesn't really need to consider the emotional factor as much as objective rationalization is needed in scientific endeavours. One can be a chemist/physicist/mathematician and careless about emotions, as it isn't pertinent to their work in general; that coupled with (generally) the scientific nature to be overtly logical and practical.

Adding to that... theoretically scientists could then function in their pursuit of science if they were overly Spockish and had no emotion whatsoever, but then the scientists wouldn't have wives/husbands. :rolleyes:
 
haha... that's true~
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
956
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top