Scientists forecast drastic extinctions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orion1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forecast
AI Thread Summary
An international group of 19 scientists has concluded that climate change will significantly contribute to species extinctions, potentially rivaling habitat destruction. Their analysis indicates that by 2050, 15 to 37 percent of the 1,103 studied species could face extinction if current warming trends persist. While the study does not encompass all species globally, it highlights the severe risks posed by climate change, emphasizing the need for efforts to mitigate global warming alongside habitat preservation. The research utilized various computer models to assess extinction risks, acknowledging a high degree of uncertainty in the predictions. Despite this uncertainty, the findings elevate global warming to a primary factor in extinction threats, alongside habitat loss. The study suggests that by 2050, affected species may reach a critical point of no return, underscoring the urgent need for further research and action to address the impacts of climate change on biodiversity.
Orion1
Messages
961
Reaction score
3
Scientists forecast drastic extinctions

An international group of 19 scientists, analyzing research around the globe, has concluded that a warming climate will rival habitat destruction in prompting widespread extinctions in this century.

By 2050, the scientists say, if current warming trends continue, 15 to 37 percent of the 1,103 species they studied will be doomed.

They did not extend their prediction to all species worldwide, but they said that the sample was large enough to show that climate change could be disastrous. In addition to current efforts to create parks and reserves, they added, efforts to decrease global warming will be necessary to reduce rates of extinction.

The analysis is built on layers of computer models of climate change and other models of the ways species become extinct, each having varying degrees of uncertainty.

Consequently, the authors say, the numbers cannot be taken as precise.

They are described in the paper as a "first pass" at quantifying the extinction threat posed by a global warming trend.

"There's a huge amount of uncertainty," said the primary author of the paper, Chris Thomas, a professor of conservation biology at the University of Leeds in England.

Daniel Botkin, professor emeritus at the University of California at Santa Barbara, an ecologist who has done extensive research on climate change, said the paper was "a valiant effort" to address the effect of warming trends on living things, an area of research he said had been slighted in favor of creating climate models.

And he acknowledged that the authors themselves presented their numbers as a beginning and a spur to further research.

He said, however, that the analysis was based on "a lot of steady state assumptions that lead it to the most pessimistic forecast," including the notion that things will stay as they are in terms of the ways animals migrate and respond to temperature change.

Scientists have been predicting drastic extinctions for years, largely because humans are steadily taking land that other creatures live on and turning it to their own purposes.

By different estimates, species are becoming extinct at rates 100 to 1,000 times as great as would be expected without human interference or a catastrophic event.

The analysis, published Wednesday in the journal Nature, raises the status of global warming from that of contributor to habitat loss to full-fledged force for extinction.

Thomas said that despite the significant uncertainties, the researchers assessed the raw data on species numbers, current habitats and past extinctions from as many angles as possible. They included species in different terrestrial environments around the world -- in Central America, South America, Australia and Africa.

They used predictions of increased temperature ranging from mild to extreme and applied three different methods for predicting extinction, all based on the relationship of species disappearance to loss of livable habitat. They also considered two different possibilities for gauging how well the different species would be able to disperse as temperatures at home became uncomfortable.

Although the results vary widely, Thomas said, even the most conservative estimates show that global warming, which he and many other scientists attribute to emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the burning of fossil fuels, presents a "very serious risk to huge numbers of species and at least ranks alongside habitat destruction" as a threat.

The paper does not predict that all the extinctions will occur by 2050, but that by that time these species will have reached the point of no return.

Reference:
http://www.sltrib.com/2004/Jan/01082004/nation_w/127182.asp
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
There was an article in the January 2004 issue of the Scientific American about the dangers of having an earlier spring. It suggested that Global warming will have a more drastic effect on temperate regions, due to all the animal migration and other season-dependant things that take place. Apparently research in Europe has shown that the food chain is being thrown way out of whack.

So, coming from Brunei (on the island of Borneo), I should be quite free from this problem for the moment. But of course, it will eventually affect us in some way. :wink:
 
I have my sincere doubts.
 
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...

Similar threads

Back
Top