Scientists want to drill into the Earth's mantle

  • Thread starter Thread starter ElliotSmith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drill
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and implications of drilling into the Earth's mantle, including historical attempts, the purpose of such missions, and the challenges involved in reaching the mantle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that drilling into the mantle has not been accomplished before, while others reference the Kola Superdeep Borehole, which reached significant depths but did not reach the mantle.
  • There is a discussion about the differences in drilling through continental crust versus oceanic crust, with some suggesting that the planned mission aims to target the thinner oceanic crust.
  • Questions are raised regarding the purpose of drilling into the mantle, with some suggesting it aims to obtain more accurate information about the mantle's composition.
  • Concerns about the temperature challenges associated with deep drilling are mentioned, with speculation about how these issues might be addressed.
  • Participants reference previous exploration efforts and the potential for future missions, including a hopeful timeline for drilling by 2030.
  • One participant discusses the limitations of current mantle samples, noting that they may not accurately represent the original conditions and compositions found deeper in the Earth.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the feasibility of drilling into the mantle, the historical context of previous drilling efforts, and the specific goals of the proposed mission. No consensus is reached on the overall implications or methodologies.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the technical challenges of deep drilling, including temperature management and the specific geological characteristics of the target areas.

Earth sciences news on Phys.org
lekh2003 said:
There is some Russian borehole where they went deeper than this mission, but they didn't make it to the mantle:

yeah, because they were drilling through very thick continental crust rather than the much thinner oceanic crust planned for this new mission
 
What will they do after they break through to the mantle?

What is the purpose of this?
 
davenn said:
yeah, because they were drilling through very thick continental crust rather than the much thinner oceanic crust planned for this new mission
Yeah, I understand. It was their mission to reach really deep, not the mantle.
 
ElliotSmith said:
What will they do after they break through to the mantle?

What is the purpose of this?
Find the composition of the mantle with more accuracy.
 
But they're hopeful they can begin drilling by 2030
A lot can happen in 12 years.

Temperature is a big issue with boreholes this deep, especially if you want to reach the mantle. I wonder how they plan to deal with this.
 
It reminded me a movie "The Core". They were using diamond hood to drill to the core.
 
  • #10
Arman777 said:
It reminded me a movie "The Core".

Or my favorite Doctor Who, Inferno. (Third Doctor, the last episode with Caroline John)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lekh2003 and Arman777
  • #11
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lekh2003 and jim mcnamara
  • #12
The purpose of this is to finally examine the largest part of the Earth in situ. We already have a numer of samples from the mantle: in ophiolites, where they form the deepest part of the floor of long-vanished oceans; in kimberlites which we mine to put a particular mantle mineral in engagement rings; finally in xenoliths, chunks of rocks torn from the depths by flowing magma. [Funny thing is that we actually know more of the uppermost mantle than the lowermost crust] The problem with our samples is that up here they are not what they were down there: they are devoid of natural gases and composed of hard-to-melt residue from original rocks. We don't know the precise mineral composition of parent rock or the original orientation of crystals. Better knowledge of these aspects is needed to e.g. better understand earthquakes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
10K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K